share_log

Compass Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CMPX) Recent 32% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Compass Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CMPX) Recent 32% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Compass Therapeutics公司(納斯達克代碼:CMPX)最近下跌32%,導致一年內的虧損增加,機構持有者可能會採取激烈措施。
Simply Wall St ·  07/05 19:38

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Compass Therapeutics' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 由於機構持有Compass Therapeutics很大的股份,所以該公司的股票價格可能容易受到他們的交易決定的影響。
  • 前八大股東持有該業務的51%。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of Compass Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CMPX) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Compass Therapeutics, Inc. (納斯達克:CMPX) 的股東構成可以體現出哪一群體最有權勢。持有該公司股票數量最多的群體,準確來說是52%的機構。換句話說,這一群體面臨着最大的正面潛力或負面風險。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 32% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 74% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Compass Therapeutics, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

上週,機構投資者看到其持有的股份總價值下降了32%。不用說,最近的損失,再加上一年中股東的74%的損失,可能會引起特定類型股東的不滿,即“流動性提供者”或機構。機構或“流動性提供者”控制着大量資金,因此這些類型的投資者通常對股價的波動有很多影響。因此,如果下跌趨勢繼續,機構可能面臨着出售Compass Therapeutics的壓力,這可能對個體投資者產生負面影響。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Compass Therapeutics, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討Compass Therapeutics的每個所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:CMPX Ownership Breakdown July 5th 2024
納斯達克: CMPX所有權結構分析2024年7月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Compass Therapeutics?

機構持股告訴我們有關Compass Therapeutics的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Compass Therapeutics already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Compass Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Compass Therapeutics已經有機構股東。他們擁有公司中相當大的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好不要僅僅依賴於所謂的機構投資者提供的驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試出售某個股票,那麼往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Compass Therapeutics以往的收益情況(如下所示)。當然,還要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:CMPX Earnings and Revenue Growth July 5th 2024
納斯達克:CMPX2024年7月5日盈利和營業收入增長情況

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 8.1% of Compass Therapeutics shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is OrbiMed Advisors LLC with 16% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Thomas Schuetz directly holds 3.8% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可能會在關鍵時刻強烈影響董事會決策。看起來對沖基金擁有Compass Therapeutics的8.1%股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值的創造(和較高的股價)。從我們的數據可以看出,OrbiMed Advisors LLC是最大的股東,持有16%的流通股。作爲對比,第二大股東持有流通股的約8.1%,第三大股東持有公司流通股的5.7%。此外,該公司的首席執行官Thomas Schuetz直接持有公司總流通股的3.8%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Compass Therapeutics

Compass Therapeutics的內部人持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Compass Therapeutics, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$4.9m worth of stock in the US$113m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

股東可能會有興趣了解內部人是否持有Compass Therapeutics股份。內部人在自己的名字下持有的該美國11300萬公司的股票總價值爲US$490萬。看到內部人有一些投資是好事,但我們通常希望看到更高的內部人持股。值得注意的是,也許可以檢查一下這些內部人是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司19%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略他們。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以在其利益方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 16%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

作爲16%的股權,私人股權公司在以創造價值爲重點的企業戰略制定方面扮演着重要角色。有些人會喜歡這種情況,因爲私人股權公司有時候是激進派,使管理層責任制水平更高。但還有些時候,私募股權公司則是在將公司上市後就賣掉。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Compass Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Compass Therapeutics (1 is concerning) that you should be aware of.

總是值得考慮不同持股群體所佔股份。但要更好地了解Compass Therapeutics,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了Compass Therapeutics 的 3個警示信號(1個令人擔憂),您應該了解一下。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論