share_log

With 66% Ownership in FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (NASDAQ:FIP), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 66% Ownership in FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (NASDAQ:FIP), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在FTAI製造行業公司(納斯達克:FIP)擁有66%的所有權,機構投資者在業務上承擔了很大風險。
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 23:50

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies FTAI Infrastructure's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高機構所有權意味着FTAI Infrastructure的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 50% 的業務由前 11 名股東持有
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

To get a sense of who is truly in control of FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (NASDAQ:FIP), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 66% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了FTAI基礎設施公司(納斯達克股票代碼:FIP),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。機構擁有66%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$86m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 161% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

在上週該公司的市值上漲了8600萬美元之後,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。目前,一年的投資回報率爲161%,上週的收益本來會非常受歡迎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of FTAI Infrastructure.

在下圖中,我們放大了FTAI基礎設施的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:FIP Ownership Breakdown July 3rd 2024
納斯達克GS:FIP 所有權明細 2024 年 7 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FTAI Infrastructure?

關於FTAI基礎設施,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that FTAI Infrastructure does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of FTAI Infrastructure, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,FTAI基礎設施確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下FTAI基礎設施過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:FIP Earnings and Revenue Growth July 3rd 2024
納斯達克GS:2024年7月3日FIP收益和收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 5.2% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is Washington State Investment Board, with ownership of 12%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.3% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.2% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。看來FTAI基礎設施有5.2%的股票由對沖基金控制。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。該公司的最大股東是華盛頓州投資委員會,所有權爲12%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有7.3%的普通股,Vanguard Group, Inc.持有該公司約5.2%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前11位的合計擁有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of FTAI Infrastructure

FTAI 基礎設施的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of FTAI Infrastructure Inc.. It seems the board members have no more than US$7.3m worth of shares in the US$884m company. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有FTAI基礎設施公司不到1%的股份。看來董事會成員在這家8.84億美元的公司中持有的股份不超過730萬美元。我們通常希望看到董事會投入更多資金。但是,可能值得檢查這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over FTAI Infrastructure. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有28%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對FTAI基礎設施有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand FTAI Infrastructure better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that FTAI Infrastructure is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit concerning...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解FTAI基礎設施,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,FTAI基礎設施在我們的投資分析中顯示出3個警告信號,其中一個有點令人擔憂...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論