share_log

Is Regal Rexnord (NYSE:RRX) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Regal Rexnord (NYSE:RRX) Using Too Much Debt?

Regal Rexnord (紐交所:RRX) 是否使用了過多債務?
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 19:32

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Regal Rexnord Corporation (NYSE:RRX) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

作爲投資者,有些人認爲波動性而非債務是風險考慮的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:“波動性與風險遠非同義詞。”當我們考慮一個公司有多少風險時,我們總是想要看看它使用債務的情況,因爲債務超載可能會導致破產。我們可以看到Regal Rexnord Corporation(紐交所:RRX)確實使用了債務來經營業務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務創建了多少風險?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

當債務和其他負債變得對業務風險時,當公司無法輕鬆履行這些義務時,會出現風險,無論是通過自由現金流還是以有吸引力的價格籌集資本。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人的債務,它可能會破產。儘管這不是太普遍,但我們經常看到企業因負債累累而“永久性稀釋”股東,因爲借款人迫使它們以苦澀的價格籌集資本。當然,債務的好處是它通常代表着便宜的資本,特別是當它代替了公司在具有高投資回報率的能力時的稀釋。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Regal Rexnord's Net Debt?

Regal Rexnord公司的淨債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Regal Rexnord had US$6.24b of debt in March 2024, down from US$7.28b, one year before. On the flip side, it has US$465.3m in cash leading to net debt of about US$5.78b.

您可以點擊下面的圖形查看歷史數字,但它顯示Regal Rexnord在2024年3月擁有62.4億美元的債務,比一年前的72.8億美元減少。另一方面,它擁有4.653億美元的現金,導致淨債務約爲57.8億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:RRX Debt to Equity History July 3rd 2024
紐交所:RRX的債務至股本歷史記錄2024年7月3日

How Healthy Is Regal Rexnord's Balance Sheet?

Regal Rexnord的資產負債表有多健康?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Regal Rexnord had liabilities of US$1.25b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$7.55b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$465.3m and US$828.1m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$7.50b.

根據最後披露的資產負債表,Regal Rexnord在12個月內有12.5億美元的負債,在12個月以上有755億美元的負債。另一方面,它擁有4.653億美元的現金和8.281億美元的應收賬款。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額750億美元。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$8.79b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

相對於其市值8.79億美元來說,這是龐大的槓桿。這表明如果公司需要迅速補充其資產負債表,股東的股份將被大量稀釋。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

卡比海運的淨債務爲1.7倍EBITDA,這表明它很好地利用了債務。 同時,EBIT利息覆蓋(7.3倍)也證明卡比海運的利潤完全足以支付管理費和計息費。此外,卡比海運過去12個月EBIT增長了64%,這種增長將使其更容易處理其債務。通過財務報表,我們確信該公司對債務的運用是明智的。然而,確保公司未來的盈利能力才是最終關鍵,這將決定卡比海運能否逐漸加強其資產負債表。此外,自由現金流還將幫助我們檢查公司的出現的任何偏離預期的現金流。

While Regal Rexnord's debt to EBITDA ratio (4.6) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 1.7, suggesting high leverage. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. Fortunately, Regal Rexnord grew its EBIT by 5.2% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Regal Rexnord can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

雖然Regal Rexnord的債務到EBITDA比率(4.6)表明它使用了一些債務,但其利息覆蓋率非常薄弱,只有1.7,表明其槓桿率很高。因此,股東應該意識到,利息費用似乎最近確實對業務產生了影響。幸運的是,Regal Rexnord的EBIT增長了5.2%,去年相對於收益而言其債務略有縮水。資產負債表顯然是分析債務的區域。但最終,業務未來的盈利能力將決定Regal Rexnord是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會覺得這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Regal Rexnord produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 67% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,雖然財務會計可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冰冷的現金。因此,邏輯的步驟是看看與實際自由現金流匹配的EBIT比例。在過去的三年中,Regal Rexnord產生了穩健的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的67%,與我們的預期相符。這份冰冷的現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

While Regal Rexnord's net debt to EBITDA makes us cautious about it, its track record of covering its interest expense with its EBIT is no better. But on the brighter side of life, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow leaves us feeling more frolicsome. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Regal Rexnord's debt poses some risks to the business. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Regal Rexnord you should know about.

雖然Regal Rexnord的淨債務到EBITDA使我們對其持謹慎態度,但它以其EBIT覆蓋利息費用的記錄並不好。但在生活更美好的一面,其將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流的能力使我們感覺更加愉快。將上述因素綜合考慮,我們認爲Regal Rexnord的債務對業務構成了一定的風險。雖然這些債務可以增加回報,但我們認爲公司現在的槓桿已足夠高。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終,每家公司都可能包含超出資產負債表之外的風險。這些風險可能很難發現。每個公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現了Regal Rexnord的1個警告標誌,您應該了解一下。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

總的來說,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包含這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論