share_log

Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 83% of the Company

Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 83% of the Company

紐交所的Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT)得到了持有該公司83%股份的機構投資者的青睞。
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 02:06

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Vertiv Holdings Co implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構實質持股Vertiv Holdings Co意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響。
  • 總共有25個投資者擁有公司的多數股份,佔有50%的所有權
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

爲了了解誰真正控制了Vertiv Holdings Co(NYSE:VRT),了解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。在公司中持有股份最多的是機構,達到了約83%。這意味着,如果股票上漲(或下跌),該組織將獲得最大收益(或是最大虧損)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Vertiv Holdings Co, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Vertiv Holdings Co的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:VRT Ownership Breakdown July 2nd 2024
NYSE: VRT所有權分解 2024年7月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vertiv Holdings Co?

機構持股告訴我們關於Vertiv Holdings Co的什麼信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Vertiv Holdings Co. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Vertiv Holdings Co, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Vertiv Holdings Co中持有相當數量的股份。這表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,要小心依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證,他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,那麼很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,最好檢查Vertiv Holdings Co的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:VRT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 2nd 2024
紐交所:VRT收益和營業收入增長2024年7月2日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.0% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該知道,機構實際擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們集體可以行使重大影響力。我們注意到對Vertiv Holdings Co沒有意義的是對沖基金。目前,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是公司最大的股東,佔流通股的9.0%。爲了了解背景,第二大股東持有流通股約7.8%,第三大股東持有7.3%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 25 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的分析表明,前25名股東擁有合計50%的股份,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Vertiv Holdings Co

Vertiv Holdings Co的內部股權佔有情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Vertiv Holdings Co. Insiders own US$327m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人員持有Vertiv Holdings Co的股份。內部人員持有價值3.27億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會注意他們是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Vertiv Holdings Co. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆,通常是個別投資者,持有Vertiv Holdings Co的14%的股份。儘管該組織不能以任何方式控制公司,但它肯定會對公司的運作產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Vertiv Holdings Co you should be aware of.

我發現了解公司的所有者非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞見,我們還需要考慮其他信息。事實證明:我們已經注意到Vertiv Holdings Co的2個警告信號,您應該意識到。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論