share_log

Fenbo Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:FEBO) Senior Key Executive Kin Shing Li Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 44% Last Week

Fenbo Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:FEBO) Senior Key Executive Kin Shing Li Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 44% Last Week

Fenbo Holdings Limited(納斯達克代碼:FEBO)的高級關鍵執行官李健升是最樂觀的內部人士,他們持股上週增加了44%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 23:20

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Fenbo Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Kin Shing Li with a 72% stake
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • Fenbo控股的重要內部持股表明了對公司擴張的固有利益。
  • 公司最大的股東是李健升,持股比例爲72%。
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Fenbo Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:FEBO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰在真正控制Fenbo控股有限公司(納斯達克:FEBO),那麼你就必須看它的股份登記冊的構成。在這家公司中擁有最多股份的團體,精確地說,約佔81%,是個人內部持股者。換句話說,該團體最可能從他們對公司的投資中獲益最多(或失去最多)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$157m market cap following a 44% gain in the stock.

因此,內部人員成爲上週得分最高的人,因爲該公司股票上漲44%,市值達到1.57億美元。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fenbo Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Fenbo控股的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:FEBO Ownership Breakdown July 2nd 2024
納斯達克CM:FEBO所有權分佈2024年7月2日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fenbo Holdings?

機構缺乏Fenbo控股的股權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Fenbo Holdings' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

機構不持有一隻股票的原因可能有多種解釋。最常見的是,相對於管理的資金來說,該公司的規模太小,因此機構根本不會仔細研究該公司。或者,可能有關於該公司的某些事情使機構投資者遠離它。Fenbo控股的收入和營業收入記錄(如下圖所示)可能對機構投資者沒有說服力,或者他們根本沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:FEBO Earnings and Revenue Growth July 2nd 2024
納斯達克CM:FEBO盈利和營收增長2024年7月2日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Fenbo Holdings. Our data suggests that Kin Shing Li, who is also the company's Senior Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 72%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. The second and third largest shareholders are Ming Pang Fung and Tong Lam Yuk, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 4.5%.

我們注意到,對於Fenbo控股而言,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據表明,公司的高級關鍵執行官李健升持有最多的股份,達到72%。當內部人員持有一家公司的大量股票時,投資者認爲這是一個積極的跡象,因爲它表明內部人員願意將他們的財富綁定在公司的未來上。第二大和第三大股東是馮明鵬和呂東林,他們持有相同數量的股份,佔4.5%。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。分析師觀點也可以達到相同的目的。我們的信息表明,這隻股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,所以它可能不是很出名。

Insider Ownership Of Fenbo Holdings

Fenbo控股的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Fenbo Holdings Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a US$128m stake in this US$157m business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有Fenbo控股有限公司的大部分所有權。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決策。所以他們在這家價值1.57億美元的公司中擁有1280萬美元的持股。大多數人會高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。你可能希望免費發現他們是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Fenbo Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有19%的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Fenbo控股有一定的影響。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以左右其政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Fenbo Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體很有價值,但還有其他更重要的因素。可以考慮到投資風險一直存在的威脅。我們已經確定了Fenbo控股的兩個警告信號,了解它們應該是你的投資過程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論