share_log

Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 60%

Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 60%

Transocean有限公司(紐交所:RIG)是機構投資者的最愛,他們擁有60%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 20:24

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Transocean's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Insiders own 10% of Transocean
  • 由於機構持有Transocean的股票比例較高,他們的交易決策可能會對其股價造成影響。
  • 企業前11大股東持有其51%的股份。
  • 內部人持有Transocean的10%。

A look at the shareholders of Transocean Ltd. (NYSE:RIG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 60% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Transocean Ltd.(NYSE:RIG)的股東,可以了解哪個群體最有影響力。 機構持有最多的股份,佔公司的60%。 換句話說,該群體面臨的正面潛力(或下行風險)最大。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Transocean.

在下面的圖表中,我們可以放大Transocean的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:RIG Ownership Breakdown July 2nd 2024
NYSE:RIG所有權狀況分解2024年7月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Transocean?

機構投資者持有Transocean的較高比例表明他們對該公司充滿信心,這對專業投資者來說是一個很好的信號。但是,我們不能僅憑這一事實進行判斷,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤,就像其他人一樣。如果兩大機構投資者同時試圖出售股票,很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得注意的是檢查Transocean的過去收益率曲線(如下)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Transocean. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Transocean, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

NYSE:RIG收益和營業收入增長狀況(2024年7月2日)

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:RIG Earnings and Revenue Growth July 2nd 2024
機構投資者持有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會對董事會決策產生強烈影響。Transocean不是由對沖基金擁有。Perestroika AS目前是該公司的最大股東,持有已發行股份的9.3%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.1%和7.3%的股票。此外,該公司的首席執行官Jeremy Thigpen直接持有總髮行股份的0.6%。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Transocean is not owned by hedge funds. Perestroika AS is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.1% and 7.3% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Jeremy Thigpen directly holds 0.6% of the total shares outstanding.

Transocean Ltd.的內部人持有相當數量的股份。它的市值只有50億美元,而內部人擁有自己名下5.21億美元的股票,這相當可觀。大多數人都會認爲,在這樣一個大型公司中,這顯示股東與公司有很好的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人是否一直在購買或出售股票。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東註冊表,我們可以看到前11大股東控制着該公司51%的股權,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Transocean

一般公衆持有Transocean的21%股份。儘管擁有相當數量的股份,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Transocean Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$5.0b, and insiders have US$521m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人在Transocean Ltd.保持着重要的股份。它的市值只有50億美元,而內部人擁有自己名下5.21億美元的股票,這相當可觀。大多數人都會認爲,在這樣一個大型公司中,這顯示股東與公司有很好的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人是否一直在購買或出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Transocean. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常,個人投資者——即一般公衆——持有Transocean的21%股份。儘管擁有相當數量的股份,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 9.3%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的9.3%。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人通過在私人公司中持有股份而不是以個人身份持有公共公司的股東,而對公共公司有利益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Transocean better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Transocean you should be aware of.

總是值得考慮持有公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解Transocean,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了一則Transocean的警示,您需要了解一下。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論