share_log

With 71% Ownership, Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 71% Ownership, Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

約翰遜和約翰遜(NYSE:JNJ)擁有71%的所有權,享有強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 18:53

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Johnson & Johnson's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 顯著較高的機構股權意味着強生(JNJ)的股票價格對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前25大股東持有42%的業務。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 71% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看強生(JNJ)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到機構擁有該公司71%的股權,這也就意味着該群體如果股票上漲將受益最多(如果出現衰退則失去最多)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Johnson & Johnson.

讓我們更近距離地看一看,看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們什麼有關強生(JNJ)的問題。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:JNJ Ownership Breakdown July 2nd 2024
NYSE:JNJ所有權分佈2024年7月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Johnson & Johnson?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於強生公司?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Johnson & Johnson. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Johnson & Johnson, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在強生(JNJ)中有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者之間的信任。但是,我們不能僅僅依賴這一點,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,則經常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查強生(JNJ)的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:JNJ Earnings and Revenue Growth July 2nd 2024
NYSE:JNJ營收和增長情況2024年7月2日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Johnson & Johnson. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.5% of shares outstanding. With 7.9% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有超過半數的已發行股票,董事會很可能要注意他們的偏好。 對沖基金在強生(JNJ)沒有太多股份。 目前,持有該公司最多股票的是巨擘集團,佔已發行股票的9.5%; 其次是持有7.9%和5.5%已發行股票的黑石集團和道富銀行。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Johnson & Johnson

強生公司的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Johnson & Johnson. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$266m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有強生(JNJ)不到1%的股份。這麼大的公司,我們不希望內部人員擁有大量股票。他們共擁有2.66億美元的股票。看到至少有些內部人員擁有股權總是好的,但最好檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司28%的股份,因此不能被忽視。雖然持股規模非常可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Johnson & Johnson (of which 1 can't be ignored!) you should know about.

我發現了解一家公司的真正所有者非常有意思。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險。每個公司都有風險,我們發現強生(JNJ)的2個警示信號(其中1個不容忽視!),您應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論