share_log

The Past Three Years for Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

The Past Three Years for Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

莫霍克工業公司(紐交所:MHK)投資者過去三年並不賺錢。
Simply Wall St ·  07/01 18:12

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But if you try your hand at stock picking, you risk returning less than the market. We regret to report that long term Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE:MHK) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 42% in three years, versus a market return of about 18%.

爲了證明個股投資的價值,值得努力超過市場指數基金的回報。但是,如果您嘗試自己選股,面臨着市場回報率以下的風險。很遺憾,長揸 Mohawk Industries 股票的投資者(NYSE:MHK)經歷了這種經歷,公司股價在三年內下跌42%,相對市場回報約爲18%。

With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.

鑑於此,值得看看該公司的基本面是否一直是長期業績的驅動因素,或者是否存在一些不一致之處。

While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

雖然市場是一個強大的定價機制,但股價反映的不僅僅是企業的基本業績,還有投資者的情緒。一個不完美但簡單的方式來考慮公司市場意識的變化是比較每股收益(EPS)的變化和股價的變化。

We know that Mohawk Industries has been profitable in the past. On the other hand, it reported a trailing twelve months loss, suggesting it isn't reliably profitable. Other metrics may better explain the share price move.

我們知道 Mohawk Industries 過去一直盈利。另一方面,其報告的過去十二個月的虧損表明其不具有可靠的盈利能力。其他度量可能更好地解釋了股價的變動。

The company has kept revenue pretty healthy over the last three years, so we doubt that explains the falling share price. There doesn't seem to be any clear correlation between the fundamental business metrics and the share price. That could mean that the stock was previously overrated, or it could spell opportunity now.

公司在過去三年中的營業收入一直非常健康,因此我們懷疑這解釋了股價下跌的原因。基本業務指標與股價之間似乎沒有明顯的相關性。這可能意味着該股票曾被高估,或者現在可能是機會。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

您可以看到以下收益和營收的變化情況(通過單擊圖像了解精確值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MHK Earnings and Revenue Growth July 1st 2024
紐交所 MHK收益和營業收入增長報告於2024年7月1日發佈

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. So we recommend checking out this free report showing consensus forecasts

值得注意的是,CEO的薪水低於規模相似公司的中位數。關注CEO的薪酬總是值得的,但更重要的問題是公司是否會在多年內增長收益。因此,我們建議查看這份顯示共識預測的免費報告。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

Mohawk Industries provided a TSR of 10% over the last twelve months. But that return falls short of the market. But at least that's still a gain! Over five years the TSR has been a reduction of 4% per year, over five years. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Mohawk Industries .

Mohawk Industries在過去十二個月內提供了10%的總股回報率。但是,這個回報率不及市場水平。但至少還是盈利的!在過去五年中,TSR年平均下降了4%,可能業務正在穩定。雖然考慮到市場環境對股價的不同影響是非常值得的,但更重要的是還有其他因素。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的與 Mohawk Industries 相關的警告信號1。

If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.

如果您願意查看另一家公司-具有潛在更優質財務狀況的公司-則不要錯過這個免費的公司列表,這些公司已經證明他們可以增長收益。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論