share_log

With 57% Ownership in Peoples Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:PEBO), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 57% Ownership in Peoples Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:PEBO), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在人民銀行股份公司擁有57%股權的情況下(納斯達克:PEBO),機構投資者在業務上有很多風險。
Simply Wall St ·  06/29 22:10

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Peoples Bancorp implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 24 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構持有 peoples bancorp 的大量股份意味着他們對公司的股價有重要影響。
  • 前 24 大股東擁有該公司 50% 的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

If you want to know who really controls Peoples Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:PEBO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想了解誰真正控制 Peoples Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:PEBO),則需要查看其股權登記簿的組成。我們可以看到,機構持有該公司的股份比例超過 57%。也就是說,一旦股票上漲(或下跌),該機構將最受益(或最虧損)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.0b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 19% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週,Peoples Bancorp 達到了 10 億美元的市值,機構投資者最終從中受益最多。股東的一年回報率目前爲 19%,上週的收益是錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Peoples Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.

接下來,我們將深入分析 Peoples Bancorp 的每種所有者類型,首先看下面的圖表。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:PEBO Ownership Breakdown June 29th 2024
NasdaqGS:PEBO 2024 年 6 月 29 日股權結構分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Peoples Bancorp?

機構持股情況說明 Peoples Bancorp 的可信度較高,但僅憑這一事實是不夠的,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得注意的是,考慮到其他因素,例如下面的 Peoples Bancorp 過去收入軌跡,而不能僅僅依賴於這一點。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Peoples Bancorp. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Peoples Bancorp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

NasdaqGS:PEBO 2024 年 6 月 29 日盈利和營業收入增長情況。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:PEBO Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2024
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能會注意到他們的偏好。我們注意到,對 Peoples Bancorp 沒有持有大量股份的對沖基金。BlackRock, Inc. 是目前該公司最大的股東,擁有 7.8% 的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有 7.1% 和 5.5% 的流通股。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Peoples Bancorp. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.8% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 5.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

Peoples Bancorp 的內部股權結構。我們最新的數據表明,內部人持有 Peoples Bancorp Inc. 的一些股份,這是一個大公司,所以看到這樣的股權結構是很好的。內部人持有價值 3900 萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想了解內部人的持股情況,可以單擊此處查看。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 24 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進行更多的挖掘後,我們發現前24個股東在該公司擁有50%的綜合所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司具有重要控制力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Peoples Bancorp

思考公司股份所有者不同組的問題始終是值得的。但要更好地了解 Peoples Bancorp,我們需要考慮到其他許多因素。例如我們發現 Peoples Bancorp 存在 2 個預警信號,您應該了解一下。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Peoples Bancorp Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$39m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士擁有 Peoples Bancorp Inc. 的一些股份。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是好的。內部人員擁有價值 3900 萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探索內部人員一致性的問題,您可以 單擊此處 查看是否有內部人員在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通投資者,包括零售投資者,持有公司39%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然此種控股規模相當大,但如果與其他大型股東的決策不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Peoples Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Peoples Bancorp you should be aware of.

思考公司股份所有者不同組的問題始終是值得的。但要更好地了解 Peoples Bancorp,我們需要考慮到其他許多因素。例如我們發現 Peoples Bancorp 存在 2 個預警信號,您應該了解一下。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論