share_log

Institutional Investors Control 74% of Independent Bank Corporation (NASDAQ:IBCP) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 13%

Institutional Investors Control 74% of Independent Bank Corporation (NASDAQ:IBCP) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 13%

機構投資者控制着美國獨立銀行股份公司(納斯達克: IBCP)的74%,在股票上漲13%後上周獲得回報
Simply Wall St ·  06/29 21:41

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Independent Bank's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着獨立銀行的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 52% 的業務由前 12 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

A look at the shareholders of Independent Bank Corporation (NASDAQ:IBCP) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 74% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看獨立銀行公司(納斯達克股票代碼:IBCP)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲74%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Last week's 13% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 66% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週13%的漲幅意味着,儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。目前,一年股東回報率爲66%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Independent Bank.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於獨立銀行的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:IBCP Ownership Breakdown June 29th 2024
納斯達克GS:IBCP所有權明細 2024年6月29日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?

關於獨立銀行,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Independent Bank already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Independent Bank's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

獨立銀行已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看獨立銀行的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:IBCP Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2024
納斯達克GS:IBCP 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 29 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It would appear that 7.4% of Independent Bank shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.4% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that William Kessel, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。看來獨立銀行7.4%的股票由對沖基金控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是貝萊德公司,其已發行股份的13%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.4%和5.2%。此外,我們發現首席執行官威廉·凱塞爾將0.7%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記處,我們可以看到52%的所有權由前12名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank

獨立銀行的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Independent Bank Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$533m, and insiders have US$13m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有獨立銀行公司的股份。它的市值僅爲5.33億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1300萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Independent Bank. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有16%所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對獨立銀行有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Independent Bank (including 1 which is significant) .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該了解我們在獨立銀行發現的兩個警告信號(包括一個重要的警告信號)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論