share_log

Individual Investors Who Hold 53% of Li-Cycle Holdings Corp. (NYSE:LICY) Gained 52%, Institutions Profited as Well

Individual Investors Who Hold 53% of Li-Cycle Holdings Corp. (NYSE:LICY) Gained 52%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有Li-Cycle Holdings Corp.(紐交所:LICY)53%股份的個人投資者獲得了52%的收益,機構也獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  06/28 22:40

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Li-Cycle Holdings' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 43% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • Li-Cycle Holdings重要的個人投資者所有權表明公司的關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 共有25位投資者擁有該公司的大多數股份,佔公司股份43%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Li-Cycle Holdings Corp. (NYSE:LICY) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Li-Cycle Holdings Corp. (NYSE:LICY)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到,個人投資者佔公司股份的53%,憑此該集團有最多的(或最少的)股權投資。

Following a 52% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but institutions who own 28% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

股價上漲52%後,個人投資者獲利最多,但持有28%股份的機構也從上漲中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Li-Cycle Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Li-Cycle Holdings的什麼情況。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LICY Ownership Breakdown June 28th 2024
NYSE:LICY所有權分佈2024年6月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Li-Cycle Holdings?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Li-Cycle Holdings的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Li-Cycle Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Li-Cycle Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所見,機構投資者在Li-Cycle Holdings中持有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯,就像所有人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一家股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看下面的Li-Cycle Holdings收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LICY Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
NYSE:LICY收益和營收增長2024年6月28日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Li-Cycle Holdings. The company's CEO Ajay Kochhar is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到對於Li-Cycle Holdings,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。該公司的首席執行官Ajay Kochhar是最大的股東,持有14%的流通股。爲了提供背景,第二大股東佔流通股的約5.3%,第三大股東持有4.9%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Li-Cycle Holdings

Li-Cycle Holdings的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Li-Cycle Holdings Corp.. Insiders own US$29m worth of shares in the US$154m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人員在Li-Cycle Holdings Corp中保持着重要的持股。內部人員在這家市值爲1.54億美元的企業中擁有價值2900萬美元的股份。我們認爲這表明股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人員可能創立了這家公司。您可以點擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 53% stake in Li-Cycle Holdings, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有Li-Cycle Holdings的大量53%股份,表明它是一支相當流行的股票。這種所有權規模爲大衆投資者帶來了某種集體力量。他們可能會影響關於執行薪酬、股息政策和提議的業務收購的決定。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Li-Cycle Holdings that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確定了Li-Cycle Holdings的2個警告信號需要您注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論