share_log

Individual Investors Are Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OBIO) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$73m Last Week

Individual Investors Are Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OBIO) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$73m Last Week

個人投資者是Orchestra BioMed Holdings,Inc.(納斯達克:OBIO)最大的股東,在市值上漲了7300萬美元后獲得了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  06/28 18:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Orchestra BioMed Holdings by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 個人投資者對Orchestra BioMed Holdings的重要控制意味着普通公衆對管理和治理相關決策有更大的影響力。
  • 前六大股東持有該業務的52%。
  • 最近有內部人員購買。

If you want to know who really controls Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:OBIO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制Orchestra BioMed Holdings Inc.(NASDAQ:OBIO),則必須查看其股份登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司37%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或如果市場出現下滑,則獲益最多的是該群體。)

Clearly, individual investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$73m last week.

顯然,上週公司市值上漲7300萬美元后,個人投資者獲益最多。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Orchestra BioMed Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討Orchestra BioMed Holdings的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:OBIO Ownership Breakdown June 28th 2024
NasdaqGM:OBIO 2024年6月28日股權結構拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Orchestra BioMed Holdings?

機構股東對Orchestra BioMed Holdings有什麼影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Orchestra BioMed Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Orchestra BioMed Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Orchestra BioMed Holdings中持有相當多的權益。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這支股票,並且喜歡它。但是,就像其他任何人一樣,他們可能會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,則經常會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Orchestra BioMed Holdings的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:OBIO Earnings and Revenue Growth June 28th 2024
NasdaqGM:OBIO收入和營收增長2024年6月28日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 16% of Orchestra BioMed Holdings. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Medtronic plc is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 16% and 7.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO David Hochman is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares.

我們的數據表明,對Orchestra BioMed Holdings的股權投資佔16%。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。Medtronic plc是目前最大的股東,持有16%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的16%和7.1%。此外,首席執行官David Hochman擁有公司股份的0.7%。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更深入的挖掘,發現前六位股東佔註冊表的約52%,這意味着除較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,因此在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Orchestra BioMed Holdings

Orchestra BioMed Holdings的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$246m, and insiders have US$6.0m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東可能會對此感興趣,因爲內部人持有Orchestra BioMed Holdings股票。它的市值僅爲2.46億美元,內部人擁有自己命名的600萬美元股票。這至少表明了一些對齊。您可以單擊此處查看內部人是否一直在購買或銷售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Orchestra BioMed Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有37%所有權的普通公衆,主要是個人投資者,對Orchestra BioMed Holdings有一定的影響力。儘管所有權規模相當,但如果決策與其他大股東不協調,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 12%, private equity firms could influence the Orchestra BioMed Holdings board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

擁有12%股權的私募股權公司可能會影響Orchestra BioMed Holdings董事會。一些投資者可能會因此受到鼓勵,因爲私募股權公司有時能夠提倡有助於市場看到公司價值的戰略。或者,這些持有人可能在將其公開後退出投資。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 16% of the Orchestra BioMed Holdings shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們可以看到,上市公司持有Orchestra BioMed Holdings已發行股份的16%。難以確定,但這表明它們具有交織的業務利益。這可能是戰略投資,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Orchestra BioMed Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Orchestra BioMed Holdings has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

思考擁有股票的不同群體總是值得的。但是,要更好地了解Orchestra BioMed Holdings,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,承擔風險-Orchestra BioMed Holdings存在3個警告標誌(1個無法忽略),我們認爲您應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論