share_log

With 79% Ownership, The Sherwin-Williams Company (NYSE:SHW) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 79% Ownership, The Sherwin-Williams Company (NYSE:SHW) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

宣偉公司(紐交所代碼:SHW)擁有79%的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  06/27 18:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Sherwin-Williams implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構對宣偉公司的實質性持有意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響。
  • 最高的24位股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls The Sherwin-Williams Company (NYSE:SHW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了宣偉公司(NYSE:SHW),那麼你就得看看其股權登記簿的構成。我們可以看到機構擁有該公司79%的所有權。換句話說,這些機構在他們對該公司的投資中獲得了最多的(或失去了最多的)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sherwin-Williams, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討宣偉公司的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SHW Ownership Breakdown June 27th 2024
NYSE: SHW 2024年6月27日股權佈局

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sherwin-Williams?

機構持股對宣偉公司有何影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Sherwin-Williams does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Sherwin-Williams' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到宣偉公司確實擁有一些機構投資者;他們持有該公司股份的很大一部分。這可能意味着該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證,因爲他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變他們對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看一下宣偉公司以下的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SHW Earnings and Revenue Growth June 27th 2024
NYSE: SHW營業收入與收益增長2024年6月27日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Sherwin-Williams is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.5% of shares outstanding. The Sherwin-Williams Company 401(K) Plan is the second largest shareholder owning 7.4% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 6.4% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決策。宣偉公司不屬於對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是持有8.5%流通股的範圍集團。宣偉公司401(K)計劃是第二大股東,持有7.4%的普通股,而黑石公司持有公司股份的約6.4%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 24 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進行更多的挖掘後,我們發現前24個股東在該公司擁有50%的綜合所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司具有重要控制力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Sherwin-Williams

宣偉公司的內部股權擁有情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of The Sherwin-Williams Company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$218m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有的宣偉公司的股份少於1%。由於這是一家大公司,我們只希望內部人員擁有它的很小一部分。但值得注意的是,他們持有2.18億美元的股票。非常高興看到董事會成員擁有多少股票,但也值得注意的是,可能值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有公司的13%股權,因此不能被輕易忽略。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們有利時推動政策決策,但他們仍可以共同影響公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Sherwin-Williams is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,宣偉公司在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,你應該了解其中的信息。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論