share_log

With 64% Ownership of the Shares, NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 64% Ownership of the Shares, NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

NewMarket公司(紐交所代號NEU),股份擁有率高達64%,主要由機構投資者持有。
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 21:22

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in NewMarket implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 7 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • 22% of NewMarket is held by insiders
  • 機構在NewMarket的大量持股表明他們對公司的股價具有重大影響力。
  • 前7大股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • NewMarket的22%股份由內部人持有。

Every investor in NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 64% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

NewMarket Corporation (紐交所代碼:NEU)的每個投資者都應該注意到最具有影響力的股東群體。該機構持有64%的股份,是公司最大的股東。換句話說,該機構的投資可以獲得或者失去最多的利潤。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about NewMarket.

讓我們近距離觀察NewMarket的不同類型股東能帶來什麼信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:NEU Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
紐交所NEU所有權結構-2024年6月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NewMarket?

機構持股情況對NewMarket意味着什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in NewMarket. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see NewMarket's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所見,機構投資者在NewMarket中擁有相當大的股份。這可能意味着該公司在投資界享有一定的信譽度。但是,最好要謹慎地依靠機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一股票時,總是存在一種“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以看到NewMarket的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事往往不止這些。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:NEU Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
紐交所NEU收益和營收增長-2024年6月26日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. NewMarket is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Bruce Gottwald with 12% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 7.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Bank of America Corporation, Asset Management Arm and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Thomas Gottwald is the owner of 3.8% of the company's shares.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大的權力。NewMarket不是對沖基金持有的。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是Bruce Gottwald,持有公司12%的股份。銀行美國銀行、資產管理手臂和The Vanguard Group,Inc.分別佔公司15%、11%和7.5%的股份。此外,首席執行官Thomas Gottwald擁有公司3.8%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更多的挖掘,並發現前7大股東佔公司註冊份額的約50%,這意味着除較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。分析師觀點也可以達到相同的目的。我們的信息表明,這隻股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,所以它可能不是很出名。

Insider Ownership Of NewMarket

NewMarket的內部股權持有情況。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of NewMarket Corporation. Insiders own US$1.1b worth of shares in the US$5.0b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

內部人擁有NewMarket Corporation的相當大比例股份。內部人擁有價值11億美元的NewMarket 50億美元公司的股票,這相當重要。大部分人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。你可能希望查看這個免費的圖表,展示了內部人最近的交易情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in NewMarket. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有NewMarket 12%的股份。雖然佔有相當的股份,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這種所有權的規模可能並不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that NewMarket is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我發現了解公司實際股東的情況非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。請注意,NewMarket在我們的投資分析中顯示出1個警告標誌,您應該知道……

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論