share_log

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

Markel集團擁有80%的股份(紐交所:MKL),受機構所有者的嚴重控制。
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 19:26

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Markel Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構對Markel Group的大量持股,他們的交易決策可能會對其股價產生影響。
  • 共有25位投資者擁有這家公司48%的所有權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

Every investor in Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 80% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每個Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL)的投資者都應該知道持股最多的股東群體。持股80%的股東是機構,也就是說,該群體的投資將對公司產生最大的影響。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Markel Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對Markel Group的影響。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:MKL Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
NYSE:MKL所有權分佈2024年6月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Markel Group?

機構持股給我們關於Markel Group的哪些信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Markel Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Markel Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Markel Group確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,而且他們喜歡它。但是,就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變了股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看看Markel Group下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MKL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
NYSE:MKL營收和增長情況2024年6月26日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Markel Group is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.0% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此他們集體擁有重要的影響力。Markel Group不是由對沖基金擁有的。目前,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有9.0%的流通股。用同樣的方式來計算,第二大股東持有約5.8%的流通股,第三大股東持有4.3%的流通股。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Markel Group

Markel Group的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Markel Group Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$332m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東可能會很感興趣地發現,內部人持有Markel Group股票。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共持有價值3.32億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會認爲,這表明股東和董事會之間有良好的利益契合度。不過,值得檢查內部人是否一直在拋售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Markel Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

佔據19%的股份,一般公衆,主要是個人投資者,對Markel Group有一定的影響力。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以在政策決策上產生影響,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Markel Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Markel Group .

在考慮投資一家公司之前,了解其不同的股東群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解Markel Group,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在Markel Group上發現的1個警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論