share_log

Great Week for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR) Institutional Investors After Losing 26% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR) Institutional Investors After Losing 26% Over the Previous Year

納伯斯實業股份有限公司(NYSE:NBR)的機構投資者過去一年損失了26%,但上週表現良好。
Simply Wall St ·  06/26 19:29

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Nabors Industries' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構持有的股份高顯著地暗示納伯斯實業的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前十大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 78% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了更好地了解納伯斯實業有哪些人真正掌控,了解公司的所有權結構非常重要。而擁有最多股份的是擁有78%所有權的機構。換句話說,該群體的投資在公司中最有可能賺取最多(或損失最多)。

Last week's US$76m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 26% losses.

上週美元市值增長7600萬美元將很可能受到機構投資者的欣賞,尤其是經歷了一年26%虧損之後。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nabors Industries.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注納伯斯實業的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:NBR Ownership Breakdown June 26th 2024
紐交所上的NBR所有權構成,截至2024年6月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nabors Industries?

機構持有情況是什麼告訴我們有關納伯斯實業的信息呢?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Nabors Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Nabors Industries, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在納伯斯實業中擁有相當大的股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好要警惕依靠機構投資者所帶來所謂的認可。他們也會有錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,見到股價暴跌也不足爲奇。所以最好還是查看納伯斯實業過去的盈利軌跡,(下面),當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:NBR Earnings and Revenue Growth June 26th 2024
紐交所NBR股票收益和營收增長情況,截至2024年6月26日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Nabors Industries is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.6% and 5.2% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Anthony Petrello directly holds 3.9% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上股份,因此他們可以集體施加重大影響力。納伯斯實業不是由對沖基金擁有的。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大的股東,持有16%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有股票的比例分別爲8.6%和5.2%。此外,該公司的首席執行官安東尼·佩特雷洛直接持有總流通股的3.9%。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步了解到,前10大股東持有通富微電大約51%的註冊資本,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,能夠在某種程度上平衡彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Nabors Industries

納伯斯實業內部股權持有情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Nabors Industries Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$668m, and insiders have US$39m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人持有納伯斯實業的股票。它的市值僅爲6.68億美元,內部人在自己名下擁有3900萬美元的股份。看到內部人有一些投資是好的,但值得檢查的是那些內部人是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Nabors Industries. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有納伯斯實業16%的股份。儘管佔有相當大的股份,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Nabors Industries better, we need to consider many other factors.

考慮擁有某家公司股份的不同群體總是有價值的。但是,爲了更好地了解納伯斯實業,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論