share_log

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 84%

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 84%

諾斯羅普格魯曼公司(NYSE:NOC)是機構投資者的首選,他們持有84%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  06/25 20:25

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Northrop Grumman's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 9 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構持股比例顯著高,意味着諾斯羅普格魯曼的股票價格對他們的交易行爲極爲敏感。
  • 前9大股東擁有該公司的52%股份。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制着諾斯羅普格魯曼公司(紐交所:NOC),那麼您必須查看它的股份登記組成。 持有該公司84%股份的是機構,即這個群體可以從其投資於該公司中最多獲利(或最多損失)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Northrop Grumman.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了諾斯羅普格魯曼的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:NOC Ownership Breakdown June 25th 2024
紐交所:NOC所有權分析-2024年6月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Northrop Grumman?

機構所有權告訴我們有關諾斯羅普格魯曼的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Northrop Grumman does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Northrop Grumman's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看出諾斯羅普格魯曼確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有該公司的相當大部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經觀察了這隻股票並喜歡它。但是,就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,存在着它們處於“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相迅速賣出股票。這種風險在一個沒有成長曆史的公司中更高。您可以看到諾斯羅普格魯曼的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,情況總是更加複雜。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:NOC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 25th 2024
紐交所:NOC營收與收益增長率分析-2024年6月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Northrop Grumman. Our data shows that Capital Research and Management Company is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者持有該公司的50%以上,因此他們可能強烈影響董事會的決策。我們注意到對於諾斯羅普格魯曼來說,對沖基金投資並不重要。我們的數據顯示,Capital Research and Management Company是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股。爲了獲得背景信息,第二大股東持有約9.5%的流通股,而第三大股東持有8.2%的流通股。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前9大股東持有超過股份註冊的一半,還有一些小股東平衡大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Northrop Grumman

諾斯羅普格魯曼的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Northrop Grumman Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$149m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人員以自己的名義僅擁有不到1%的諾斯羅普格魯曼公司股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人員擁有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值1.49億美元的股份。看到董事會成員擁有股份是好事,但是了解這些內部人員是否一直在買入也可能值得考慮。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通大衆--包括零售投資者--擁有公司10%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這種所有權規模很大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Northrop Grumman that you should be aware of.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經識別出了諾斯羅普格魯曼存在的2個警告信號,您應該了解這些信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論