share_log

DuPont De Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 73%

DuPont De Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 73%

杜邦德莫斯公司(紐交所:DD)是機構投資者的最愛,他們擁有73%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  06/24 19:33

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DuPont de Nemours' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 由於機構持有杜邦的股份較大,因此他們的交易決策可能會對杜邦德諾爾的股價造成影響。
  • 前25大股東擁有該公司的49%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

Every investor in DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 73% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

杜邦德諾爾(紐交所:DD)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的群體,準確地說約佔73%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DuPont de Nemours, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討杜邦德諾爾的每種業主類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:DD Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2024
紐交所:DD所有權拆分2024年6月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DuPont de Nemours?

機構持有權告訴我們關於杜邦德諾爾的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

DuPont de Nemours already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of DuPont de Nemours, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

杜邦德諾爾的股份註冊表上已經有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但是像其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查杜邦德諾爾的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:DD Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2024
紐交所:DD盈利和營收增長2024年6月24日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in DuPont de Nemours. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應該注意機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同擁有重大影響力。我們注意到,對杜邦德諾爾持有最多股份的是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,佔流通股的11%。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的7.1%和5.2%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of DuPont de Nemours

杜邦德諾爾的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of DuPont de Nemours, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$73m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據表明,內部持有杜邦德諾爾的股份不到1%。規模如此之大,我們不應該指望內部持有大量股票。他們共同擁有7300萬美元的股票。董事會成員擁有股份是好事,但也可能值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資人,擁有該公司27%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然該群體不能決定公司的政策,但它確實可以對公司的經營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - DuPont de Nemours has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮一個公司的不同業主群體非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,承擔風險——杜邦德諾爾有4個警告信號,我們認爲您應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論