share_log

With 87% Ownership of the Shares, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDNS) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 87% Ownership of the Shares, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDNS) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

在納斯達克上市的鏗騰電子股份有限公司(NASDAQ: CDNS)擁有87%的股份所有權,由機構股東主導。
Simply Wall St ·  06/23 20:55

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Cadence Design Systems' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構對鏗騰電子的股票擁有巨大的持股比例,他們的交易決策可能會使其股價脆弱。
  • 前21大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

Every investor in Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDNS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

納斯達克:CDNS的每一個投資者都應該意識到最有權勢的股東群體。機構擁有公司最大的股份佔總股本的87%。換句話說,該群體在其對公司的投資中可能會獲得最多(或者損失最多)的利益。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cadence Design Systems, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討鏗騰電子每種所有者的情況,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CDNS Ownership Breakdown June 23rd 2024
NASDAQ: CDNS持有情況分析報告2024年6月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cadence Design Systems?

機構所有權對鏗騰電子有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Cadence Design Systems already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Cadence Design Systems' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

鏗騰電子已經被機構投資者持股。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者對其有些信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看鏗騰電子下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CDNS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 23rd 2024
NASDAQ: CDNS收入和利潤增長報告2024年6月23日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Cadence Design Systems is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. With 9.1% and 4.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強烈影響董事會的決策。鏗騰電子不是由對沖基金擁有的。目前,貝萊德公司是最大的股東,持有公司11%的流通股數量。第二大和第三大股東分別是流通股的9.1%和4.3%的持有者,分別爲:先鋒集團和道富銀行。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前21名股東擁有公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Cadence Design Systems

鏗騰電子內部所有權情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$721m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,鏗騰電子的內部人員持有不到1%的股份。由於公司規模較大,我們只期望內部人員擁有較小的部分股權。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值7.21億美元的股份。有一些內部人員持有股份總是一件好事,但有必要檢查這些內部人員是否一直在拋售股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cadence Design Systems. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有12%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成的普通公衆對鏗騰電子有一定的影響力。儘管擁有相當大的股權,但如果決策不與其他大股東保持同步,這樣的股權可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論