share_log

With 81% Institutional Ownership, Reliance, Inc. (NYSE:RS) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 81% Institutional Ownership, Reliance, Inc. (NYSE:RS) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

憑藉81%的機構持股,Reliance, Inc.(紐交所:RS)是大佬們中的最愛。
Simply Wall St ·  06/19 21:59

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Reliance's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構高度持股意味着信實公司的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 17名股東持有50%的業務。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Reliance, Inc. (NYSE:RS) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

觀察Reliance公司(紐交所:RS)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具權力。掌握該公司最多股份數量的群體,準確來說是機構,佔該公司股份的81%左右。也就是說,該群體如果股票上漲將獲益最多(如果下跌便損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Reliance, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地了解Reliance的每種所有者類型,從以下圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:RS Ownership Breakdown June 19th 2024
紐交所:RS所有權分佈2024年6月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Reliance?

機構持股情況對信實公司有何啓示?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Reliance does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Reliance, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到信實公司確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分,這表明專業投資者對該公司有信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤,就像每個人都可能犯錯一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌也是很常見的情況。因此,值得查看Reliance的以往收益軌跡(如下)。當然,還要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:RS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 19th 2024
紐交所: RS盈利和收入增長2024年6月19日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Reliance. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.5% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對於Reliance,對沖基金沒有太多股份,該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,佔有12%的所有權,BlackRock,Inc.是第二大股東,擁有普通股的11%,State Street Global Advisors,Inc.持有該公司股票約4.5%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們擁有的所有權數據的更深入研究表明,前17大股東共擁有50%的股權,這意味着沒有任何一個單一股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Reliance

信實公司內部所有權情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that Reliance, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$103m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,信實公司內部人士擁有的公司股份不足1%。由於該公司規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部人士擁有大量股份。他們共同擁有1.03億美元的股票。從另一方面來看,近期的購買和出售也同樣重要。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司中擁有18%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。儘管擁有的股份相當可觀,但如果政策決策不符合其他大股東的利益,它可能無法改變公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Reliance (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。例如,我們發現Reliance存在兩個警訊(其中一個比較棘手!)在進行投資前應該了解清楚。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論