share_log

Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MYPS) Market Cap Dropped by US$51m

Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MYPS) Market Cap Dropped by US$51m

納斯達克:MYPS市值下降5,100萬美元后,持有重要股份的散戶和機構都可能感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  06/19 21:35

Key Insights

主要見解

  • PLAYSTUDIOS' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders own 16% of PLAYSTUDIOS
  • PLAYSTUDIOS重要的零售投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更大的公衆股東的影響。
  • 前25大股東持有47%的業務。
  • 內部人擁有PLAYSTUDIOS 16%的股份。

If you want to know who really controls PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. (NASDAQ:MYPS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道真正控制PLAYSTUDIOS,Inc.(NASDAQ:MYPS)的人是誰,那麼您將必須查看其股份登記簿的構成。在該公司持有最多股份的集團股東中,約佔47%,是零售投資者。換句話說,該集團將從其對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)回報。

While institutions who own 36% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$268m last week,retail investors took the most losses.

雖然機構投資者持股36%在上週市值下跌至2.68億美元后承受了壓力,但零售投資者蒙受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about PLAYSTUDIOS.

讓我們仔細了解一下不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關PLAYSTUDIOS的什麼信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:MYPS Ownership Breakdown June 19th 2024
納斯達克GM:MYPS所有權結構分佈2024年6月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PLAYSTUDIOS?

機構投資者對PLAYSTUDIOS告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PLAYSTUDIOS. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of PLAYSTUDIOS, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在PLAYSTUDIOS中持有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者之間有一定的信譽。但如果僅僅依賴於這個事實是不可靠的,因爲機構投資者有時會像其他人一樣做出錯誤的投資。如果有兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌也不是罕見的現象。因此,值得檢查PLAYSTUDIOS以往的盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:MYPS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 19th 2024
納斯達克GM:MYPS業績和營收增長2024年6月19日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in PLAYSTUDIOS. With a 14% stake, CEO Andrew Pascal is the largest shareholder. With 4.9% and 3.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Icon Management Associates LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

對於PLAYSTUDIOS,對沖基金沒有持有太多的股份。持股14%的CEO Andrew Pascal是最大的股東。以4.9%和3.9%的流通股份比例,BlackRock,Inc.和Icon Management Associates LLC分別是第二和第三大股東。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of PLAYSTUDIOS

PLAYSTUDIOS的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc.. Insiders own US$43m worth of shares in the US$268m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據表明內部人擁有PLAYSTUDIOS,Inc.的合理比例。內部人在這家市值爲2.68億美元的公司中持有4300萬美元的股份。我們認爲這表明內部人與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相對較小;一些內部人可能創立了業務。您可以單擊此處查看內部人是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括零售投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司47%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然該集團不能決定一切,但它肯定可以對公司的經營產生實質性影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡檢查營收增長的歷史記錄。您也可以通過查看這個詳細的圖表中歷史營收和收益的免費圖表來了解。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論