share_log

Institutional Investors in EverQuote, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVER) See US$108m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in EverQuote, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVER) See US$108m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

儘管持續獲利,上週EverQuote,Inc. (納斯達克:everquote) 的機構投資者市值減少了 US$108m。
Simply Wall St ·  06/18 18:29

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies EverQuote's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構大量持股意味着EverQuote的股價對他們的交易行動非常敏感。
  • 排名前11的股東持有該業務的52%。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of EverQuote, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVER) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 61% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看EverQuote,Inc.(納斯達克:EVER)的股東可以告訴我們其中哪一組最強大。我們可以看到機構擁有公司的大部分股權,佔61%,換句話說,該組面臨的上行潛力(或下行風險)最大。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$108m last week. However, the 157% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

公司市值上週下跌了1.08億美元,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。但是,股東們一年的回報率達157%,這可能有所緩解。但是,我們認爲他們將密切關注未來的弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of EverQuote, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究EverQuote的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:EVER Ownership Breakdown June 18th 2024
納斯達克:EVER所有權分解2024年6月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About EverQuote?

機構持股告訴我們有關EverQuote的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

EverQuote already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at EverQuote's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

EverQuote已經有機構參與股權登記。事實上,他們擁有公司的相當大的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要過度依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看EverQuote下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:EVER Earnings and Revenue Growth June 18th 2024
納斯達克:EVER盈利和營收增長2024年6月18日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in EverQuote. Link Equity Partners, LLC is currently the largest shareholder, with 20% of shares outstanding. Driehaus Capital Management LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 5.4% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 4.9% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Jayme Mendal directly holds 0.5% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上,因此他們可以集體行使重大權力。對EverQuote來說,對沖基金的股份不多。Link Equity Partners,LLC目前是最大的股東,持有20%的流通股份。Driehaus Capital Management LLC是第二大股東,擁有5.4%的普通股,BlackRock,Inc.持有公司股票的約4.9%。此外,該公司的首席執行官Jayme Mendal直接持有總流通股本的0.5%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 52% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的研究,我們發現前11位的持股比例爲52%,表明沒有單一股東對公司有重大控制。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of EverQuote

EverQuote的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in EverQuote, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$666m, and insiders have US$43m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據表明內部股東擁有EverQuote,Inc.的一些股份。它的市值僅爲6.66億美元,並且內部人員擁有價值4300萬美元的股份。看到內部人員進行了一些投資是好的,但最好檢查這些內部人員是否一直在購買股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over EverQuote. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有11%的公司所有權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對EverQuote有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大型股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 20% stake in EverQuote. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有EverQuote的20%股權。這意味着他們可以在重要的政策決策中發揮影響力。一些投資者可能會因此而感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵市場看到公司的價值。或者,這些持有者可能在上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with EverQuote , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,不斷存在的投資風險。我們已經確定了EverQuote的2個警告,了解它們應該成爲您的投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論