Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Alibaba Group Holding Limited's (NYSE:BABA) Market Cap Dropped by US$14b
Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Alibaba Group Holding Limited's (NYSE:BABA) Market Cap Dropped by US$14b
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Alibaba Group Holding by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 37% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 41% of Alibaba Group Holding is held by Institutions
- 零售投資者對阿里巴巴集團控股的顯著影響意味着普通公衆有更多影響管理和治理相關決策的權力。
- 前25名股東持有37%的業務。
- 阿里巴巴集團有41%的機構持有。
If you want to know who really controls Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 42% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着阿里巴巴集團控股有限公司(紐約證券交易所:BABA),那麼你必須看看它的股份登記簿的構成。持有42%所有權的零售投資者持有最大一部分的股份。換句話說,這個集團最有可能從他們投資公司中獲得最多的(或失去最多的)利益。
While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 7.5% price drop, institutions with their 41% holdings also suffered.
雖然上週阿里巴巴集團股價下跌了7.5%,零售投資者的持有也受到打擊,但持有41%持股的機構也遭受了損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Alibaba Group Holding.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於阿里巴巴集團控股的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alibaba Group Holding?
機構持有告訴我們關於阿里巴巴集團控股的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Alibaba Group Holding already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Alibaba Group Holding's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
阿里巴巴集團控股已經有些機構在其股份登記簿上。確實,他們在公司中擁有一個值得尊重的股份。然而,最好要警惕依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對一家公司的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看看下面阿里巴巴集團控股的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Alibaba Group Holding. Our data shows that SoftBank Group Corp. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 3.5% and 3.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到,對於阿里巴巴集團控股來說,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,SoftBank Group Corp.是最大的股東,擁有14%的流通股。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的3.5%和3.0%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Alibaba Group Holding
阿里巴巴集團控股的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in Alibaba Group Holding Limited. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$2.4b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以看到內部人員持有阿里巴巴集團控股有限公司的股份。它是一個非常大的公司,董事會成員共擁有價值24億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到這個投資水平是很好的。你可以在此處檢查這些內部人員最近是否購買股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 42% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有42%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這樣的持股規模可能不足以在其利益方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 14% of the Alibaba Group Holding shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到公共公司持有發行的阿里巴巴集團控股股份的14%。我們不能確定,但很可能這是一種戰略性持股。這些公司可能是相似的,或者是相互合作的。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Alibaba Group Holding better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Alibaba Group Holding , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
想一想公司的不同股東群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解阿里巴巴集團控股,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,一直以來存在的投資風險。我們已經確定了1個警告信號,了解它們應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。