share_log

Beyond, Inc.'s (NYSE:BYON) Recent 8.4% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Beyond, Inc.'s (NYSE:BYON) Recent 8.4% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Beyond公司(紐交所:BYON)近期下跌了8.4%,這加劇了該公司一年內的虧損,機構投資者可能會採取激烈措施。
Simply Wall St ·  06/14 23:11

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Beyond's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着Beyond的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前十名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 內部人士最近一直在買入

If you want to know who really controls Beyond, Inc. (NYSE:BYON), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 70% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Beyond, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:BYON),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲70%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$626m last week after a 8.4% drop in the share price. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 38% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Beyond, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

因此,上週該公司的市值在股價下跌8.4%後跌至6.26億美元,因此機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。毋庸置疑,最近的虧損進一步增加了38%的股東一年虧損,但下降幅度可能不大,尤其是對於這類股東而言。機構通常被稱爲 “市場推動者”,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有強大的力量。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續下去,機構可能會面臨賣出Beyond的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Beyond.

在下圖中,我們放大了Beyond的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BYON Ownership Breakdown June 14th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BYON 所有權明細 2024 年 6 月 14 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Beyond?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Beyond的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Beyond does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Beyond, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Beyond確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Beyond過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BYON Earnings and Revenue Growth June 14th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BYON 收益和收入增長 2024 年 6 月 14 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 8.4% of Beyond shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that JAT Capital Management, L.P. is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. With 9.6% and 8.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and JAT Capital Management LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。看來對沖基金擁有Beyond8.4%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。我們的數據顯示,JAT Capital Management, L.P. 是最大股東,已發行股份的10%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和JAT Capital Management LP分別佔已發行股份的9.6%和8.4%,是第二和第三大股東。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前十名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Beyond

Beyond 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Beyond, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$8.2m worth of stock in the US$626m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有Beyond, Inc.的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值6.26億美元的公司價值820萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司20%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Beyond better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Beyond .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是要更好地理解 Beyond,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在Beyond中發現的兩個警告信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論