share_log

Great Week for GDS Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:GDS) Institutional Investors After Losing 31% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for GDS Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:GDS) Institutional Investors After Losing 31% Over the Previous Year

納斯達克萬國數據控股有限公司(NASDAQ:GDS)機構投資者經歷了一週的大漲,此前一年損失了31%。
Simply Wall St ·  06/12 20:06

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies GDS Holdings' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 4 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構的大量持股說明GDS Holdings的股票價格對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前4大股東擁有該公司的52%。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

A look at the shareholders of GDS Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:GDS) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 41% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看萬國數據(NASDAQ:GDS)的股東,可以知道哪個群體最有影響力。擁有最大股份的是持股41%的機構。換句話說,該群體面臨最高的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

Last week's US$140m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 31% losses.

上週1.4億美元的市值增長可能會受到機構投資者的讚賞,尤其是在經歷了31%的虧損後。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of GDS Holdings.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點放在GDS Holdings的不同股權組中。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:GDS Ownership Breakdown June 12th 2024
納斯達克GM:GDS股權構成2024年6月12日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GDS Holdings?

機構投資者通常將自己的回報率與一項常見的指數的回報率進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的大公司。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in GDS Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see GDS Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在GDS Holdings擁有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者對其有一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會進行糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有某隻股票時,始終存在它們處於“擁擠交易”中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到GDS Holdings的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事裏總有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:GDS Earnings and Revenue Growth June 12th 2024
納斯達克GM:GDS收益和營業收入增長2024年6月12日

GDS Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that STT GDC Pte. Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 39% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.9% and 4.5% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Wei Huang is the owner of 3.5% of the company's shares.

GDS Holdings不是由對沖基金持有的。我們的數據顯示STT GDC Pte.Ltd.擁有39%的流通股份,是最大的股東。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有大約4.9%和4.5%的股票。此外,CEO黃偉擁有公司股份的3.5%。股東可能會有興趣了解到內部人士在萬國數據有股票。它是一個相當大的公司,因此看到一些具有潛在重大影響的利益相關者是一種積極的情況。在這種情況下,他們擁有約6100萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人員的立場問題,可以點擊這裏查看其是否一直在購買或出售。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of GDS Holdings

萬國數據的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人士的精確定義可能是主觀的,幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,如果他們是創始人或CEO,經理成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in GDS Holdings Limited. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$61m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

擁有17%股份的普通公衆,主要是個體投資者,在萬國數據公司中具有一定的影響力。儘管擁有這麼大的股份,如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能無法改變公司政策。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GDS Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司股份的39%。這可能值得更深入地探討。如果股份內部人士等相關方在其中的一個私營公司中持有利益,則應在年報中披露該情況。私營公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 39%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

儘管考慮擁有該公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。作爲例子:我們已經發現GDS Holdings存在3個警告信號,您應該知道。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for GDS Holdings you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到不同的公司團體是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們已經發現GDS Holdings有3個警告信號,您需要注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論