share_log

Individual Investors Who Hold 36% of IFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) Gained 3.4%, Insiders Profited as Well

Individual Investors Who Hold 36% of IFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) Gained 3.4%, Insiders Profited as Well

持有奕豐集團(SGX:AIY)36%股份的個人投資者獲得了3.4%收益,內部人員也獲利了。
Simply Wall St ·  06/08 08:09

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in iFAST indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 4 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 奕豐的許多個體投資者持有大部分股份,這意味着他們在公司管理和業務策略中擁有更大的話語權。
  • 前 4 大股東擁有公司的 55% 股份。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

A look at the shareholders of iFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 36% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

了解奕豐集團股份有限公司(SGX:AIY)的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最有權力。在公司中持有最多股份的是個體投資者,佔公司股份的約 36%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該團體將受益最多(或如果有下跌,則損失最大)。

While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 3.4% price gain, insiders also received a 29% cut.

雖然在上週的 3.4% 的股票漲幅中,個體投資者是賺取最多的團體,但內部人員也獲得了 29% 的股票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of iFAST, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討奕豐集團的每種股東類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:AIY Ownership Breakdown June 8th 2024
SGX:AIY 擁有權益的拆分(2024 年 6 月 8 日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iFAST?

機構投資者對奕豐集團的投資指示了該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變他們的股票觀點,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,查看奕豐集團的收益歷史非常重要。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

iFAST already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see iFAST's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

奕豐集團已經有機構持股,事實上,它們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過該股票並且認爲它很好。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在着他們對某種“擁擠”的交易的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多個方面可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一家沒有成長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在以下看到奕豐的歷史收益和營業收入情況,但請記住,這只是故事的一部分。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:AIY Earnings and Revenue Growth June 8th 2024
SGX:AIY 收益和營收增長(2024 年 6 月 8 日)

Hedge funds don't have many shares in iFAST. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Chung Chun Lim with 19% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 17% and 12% of the stock.

對於奕豐集團而言,對沖基金並沒有太多股票。通過查看我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是 CEO 鄭俊霖,持有公司已發行股份的 19%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東的持股比例約爲 17% 和 12%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of iFAST

普通大衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有公司的36%股份,因此不能輕鬆忽略。雖然這樣的所有權規模可能不足以左右他們的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of iFAST Corporation Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just S$2.1b, and insiders have S$598m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據表明,奕豐集團的內部人員擁有相當比例的股份。它的市值只有 21 億新元,並且內部人員擁有自己名下價值 5.98 億新元的股票。這相當可觀。通過這裏可以查看他們最近是否一直在購買股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 36% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over iFAST. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有 36% 的持股比例的個人投資者屬於大衆,他們對奕豐集團仍然有一定影響力。儘管擁有這樣比例的股份可能不足以影響他們的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the iFAST stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

似乎私人公司擁有 iFAST 的 13% 股權。單從這個事實中很難得出任何結論,所以值得進一步研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時候,內部人員或其他相關方通過一個獨立的私人公司擁有對公開公司的股份興趣。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand iFAST better, we need to consider many other factors.

總是值得考慮持有公司股份的不同團體。但要更好地了解奕豐集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論