share_log

Following a 9.7% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX) Institutional Owners

Following a 9.7% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX) Institutional Owners

由於去年下降了9.7%,因此Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (紐交所:ALEX)的機構所有者最近的收益可能會令人滿意
Simply Wall St ·  06/06 18:15

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Alexander & Baldwin's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構大量持有股份意味着Alexander & Baldwin的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前6名股東持有公司51%的股份。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

Every investor in Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 88% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.(NYSE:ALEX)的每個投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。機構持有88%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體,如果股票上漲將獲利最多(或者如果出現衰退則虧損最多)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 4.2% increase in the share price after a year of 9.7% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

經過一年9.7%的虧損後,機構投資者很可能對上週股價上漲4.2%的漲勢表示歡迎,看起來收益可能開始趨勢上升。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Alexander & Baldwin.

讓我們仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Alexander & Baldwin的什麼信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ALEX Ownership Breakdown June 6th 2024
NYSE:ALEX所有權分佈2024年6月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alexander & Baldwin?

機構所有權對Alexander & Baldwin有何影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Alexander & Baldwin already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Alexander & Baldwin's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Alexander & Baldwin已經有機構投資者在股票註冊表上了。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當一部分的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。但是最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂的認證。他們也有時會犯錯。當多家機構投資者持有一隻股票時,總會存在着一個“擁擠的交易”的風險。當這樣一筆交易出現問題時,多方面可能會競爭快速賣出該股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Alexander & Baldwin的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事並不止於此。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ALEX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 6th 2024
NYSE:ALEX利潤和營業收入增長2024年6月6日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Alexander & Baldwin is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 18% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 16% and 5.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股份,理事會可能會注意他們的偏好。Alexander & Baldwin沒有被對沖基金所持有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是BlackRock,Inc.,持有18%的流通股。然而,第二和第三大的股東分別持有流通股的16%和5.5%。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更深入的研究,發現前6名股東大約佔有51%的持股比例,意味着除了大股東以外,還有一些小股東,因此在一定程度上平衡了各自的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以加深對股票預期表現的全面了解也是一個好習慣。雖然有部分分析師的覆蓋,但該公司可能沒有受到廣泛的關注。因此,在未來可能會受到更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Alexander & Baldwin

Alexander & Baldwin的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$16m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到內部人員擁有Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.的股份。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是好的。內部人員持有價值1600萬美元的股份(以當前價格計算)。看到內部人員進行投資是好的。您可以在這裏查看最近的購買情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。雖然持股規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Alexander & Baldwin has 3 warning signs (and 2 which are a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about.

我覺得看一個公司到底由誰擁有是非常有趣的事情。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,需要承擔風險——Alexander & Baldwin有3個警告信號(其中2個有點令人不悅),我們認爲您需要了解到這些內容。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論