share_log

Is Studio City International Holdings (NYSE:MSC) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Studio City International Holdings (NYSE:MSC) Using Too Much Debt?

新濠影匯控股(紐交所:msc)是否過度使用債務?
Simply Wall St ·  06/04 03:55

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Studio City International Holdings Limited (NYSE:MSC) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

作爲投資者,有些人認爲波動性而非債務是衡量風險的最好方法,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過,“波動性與風險遠非同義詞。” 當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們通常喜歡查看其使用債務的情況,因爲債務過載可能導致滅亡。我們可以看到,新濠影匯控股有限公司(紐交所:MSC)確實在其業務中使用債務。 但這些債務會不會讓股東感到擔憂呢?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

當企業不能輕鬆以自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資本來實現債務的時候,債務和其他負債就變得有風險了。資本主義的一個重要組成部分是“創造性破壞”的過程,即債權人無情地清算失敗的企業。然而,常見的(但仍然痛苦的)情況是,企業必須以低價發行新股權,從而永久性地稀釋股東權益。當然,許多公司使用債務資助增長,而沒有任何負面後果。考慮一家公司的債務水平時的第一步是將其現金和債務放在一起考慮。

How Much Debt Does Studio City International Holdings Carry?

新濠影匯控股承擔了多少債務?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Studio City International Holdings had US$2.34b of debt in March 2024, down from US$2.44b, one year before. However, it does have US$218.0m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$2.12b.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年3月,新濠影匯控股有限公司有23.4億美元的債務,而一年前爲24.4億美元。然而,它確實有2.18億美元的現金抵消這一點,導致淨債務約爲21.2億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:MSC Debt to Equity History June 3rd 2024
紐交所:MSC債務股本比歷史記錄(2024年6月3日)

A Look At Studio City International Holdings' Liabilities

查看新濠影匯控股的負債情況

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Studio City International Holdings had liabilities of US$115.7m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$2.35b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$218.0m in cash and US$33.1m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$2.22b.

放大最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到,新濠影匯控股有限公司有1.157億美元的負債到期在12個月內,以及2.35億美元的負債超過12個月到期。相對應的,它有2.18億美元的現金和3310萬美元的應收賬款到期在12個月內。因此,其負債超過其現金和(近期)應收賬款的總和2.22億美元。

Given this deficit is actually higher than the company's market capitalization of US$1.49b, we think shareholders really should watch Studio City International Holdings's debt levels, like a parent watching their child ride a bike for the first time. Hypothetically, extremely heavy dilution would be required if the company were forced to pay down its liabilities by raising capital at the current share price.

考慮到這個逆差實際上比公司1.49億美元的市值更高,我們認爲股東們真的應該像父母第一次看孩子騎車一樣關注新濠影匯控股的債務水平。假如公司被迫以當前股價籌集資本來償還其負債,就需要面臨極度的重大稀釋問題。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們使用兩個主要比率來分析債務與收益之間的關係。第一個比率是淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比率,第二個比率是其利潤前利潤和稅(EBIT)覆蓋利息支出的次數(或其利息覆蓋比率)。這種方法的優點在於我們考慮到了債務的絕對數量(通過淨債務與EBITDA的比率),以及與這些債務相關的實際利息支出(通過其利息覆蓋比率)。

Studio City International Holdings shareholders face the double whammy of a high net debt to EBITDA ratio (11.1), and fairly weak interest coverage, since EBIT is just 0.12 times the interest expense. The debt burden here is substantial. One redeeming factor for Studio City International Holdings is that it turned last year's EBIT loss into a gain of US$15m, over the last twelve months. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Studio City International Holdings will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

新濠影匯控股股東面臨高淨債務至息稅前利潤(EBITDA)比率(11.1)和相當薄弱的利息覆蓋率的雙重打擊,因爲EBIT僅爲利息支出的0.12倍。這裏的債務負擔非常沉重。對於新濠影匯控股來說,唯一的補救因素是它把去年的EBIT虧損轉化爲12個月內的1500萬美元收益。當分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。但是,由於新濠影匯控股還需要盈利來償還債務,因此不能孤立地看待債務。因此,在考慮債務時,一定要了解收益趨勢。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it is important to check how much of its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) converts to actual free cash flow. During the last year, Studio City International Holdings burned a lot of cash. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

最後,公司只能用現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。因此,檢查其息稅前利潤(EBIT)轉化爲實際自由現金流的比例非常重要。在過去的一年中,新濠影匯控股燒掉了很多現金。雖然投資者無疑希望這種情況在不久的將來得以扭轉,但這確實意味着其使用債務更加有風險。

Our View

我們的觀點

To be frank both Studio City International Holdings's interest cover and its track record of converting EBIT to free cash flow make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. Having said that, its ability to grow its EBIT isn't such a worry. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think Studio City International Holdings has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Studio City International Holdings you should be aware of, and 2 of them shouldn't be ignored.

坦率地說,新濠影匯控股的利息覆蓋率和將息稅前利潤(EBIT)轉化爲自由現金流的記錄讓我們對其債務水平感到不安。儘管如此,它增長EBIT的能力並不令人擔憂。考慮到討論的數據點,我們認爲新濠影匯控股的債務太多了。雖然一些投資者喜歡那種冒險的做法,但這絕對不是我們的菜。資產負債表顯然是您在分析債務時要專注的區域。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存放在資產負債表中,遠非如此。例如:我們已經發現了3個警告信號,您應該注意新濠影匯控股,其中有2個不應被忽視。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論