share_log

CRH Plc (NYSE:CRH) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 68% of the Company

CRH Plc (NYSE:CRH) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 68% of the Company

crh水泥(紐交所: CRH)主要由持股68%的機構股東控制。
Simply Wall St ·  06/03 20:31

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies CRH's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 35% ownership
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 持有CRH股票的大量機構意味着其股價對其交易行動非常敏感。
  • 共有25位投資者持有公司的大部分股份,佔有35%的所有權。
  • 最近有內部人員購買。

A look at the shareholders of CRH plc (NYSE:CRH) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 68% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下CRH股份有限公司 (紐交所:CRH) 的股東,可以告訴我們哪一組最有實力。擁有最大份額的組織是持有68%股份的機構,換句話說,這個團體面臨着最高的上漲潛力 (或下跌風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CRH.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對CRH告訴我們什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CRH Ownership Breakdown June 3rd 2024
紐交所:CRH所有權分析報告2024年6月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CRH?

機構持股情況對CRH有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that CRH does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CRH's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,CRH確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的很大一部分股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但是我們不能單單依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時候會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會面臨着集中交易的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有成長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以看到CRH的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,還有更多的故事。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CRH Earnings and Revenue Growth June 3rd 2024
紐交所:CRH利潤和收入增長情況報告2024年6月3日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. CRH is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 3.9% of shares outstanding. FMR LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 3.6% of common stock, and Cevian Capital AB holds about 2.3% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大的權力。CRH不是由對沖基金擁有的。目前最大的股東是先鋒集團,擁有3.9%的持股。其次,FMR LLC擁有3.6%的普通股,Cevian Capital AB持有公司股票的約2.3%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of CRH

CRH的內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of CRH plc in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$21m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人員在CRH股份有限公司中擁有不到1%的自有資本。由於規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部人員擁有該公司的大部分股份。總體而言,他們共擁有價值2100萬美元的股票。值得注意的是最近的買賣同樣重要。您可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in CRH. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有CRH的32%股份。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以對他們有利的政策做出決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for CRH you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同團體是值得的,但有一些其他更爲重要的因素。例如:我們發現CRH存在2個警示信號,您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論