share_log

Cricut, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRCT) Recent 4.7% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Cricut, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRCT) Recent 4.7% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Cricut, Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:CRCT)最近4.7%的回調增加了爲期一年的虧損,機構所有者可能會採取嚴厲措施
Simply Wall St ·  05/30 21:59

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Cricut's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 58% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Petrus Trust Company, LTA)
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着Cricut的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 公司58%的股份由單一股東持有(Petrus Trust Company,LTA)
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

A look at the shareholders of Cricut, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRCT) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 68% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Cricut, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CRCT)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲68%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$65m. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 30% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Cricut which might hurt individual investors.

結果,在市值下降6500萬美元之後,機構投資者上週遭受了最大的損失。毋庸置疑,最近的虧損進一步增加了股東一年的30%虧損,但下降幅度可能不大,尤其是對於這類股東而言。機構通常被稱爲 “市場推動者”,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有強大的力量。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售Cricut,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cricut.

在下圖中,我們放大了Cricut的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CRCT Ownership Breakdown May 30th 2024
納斯達克GS:CRCT 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 30 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cricut?

關於Cricut,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Cricut does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Cricut's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Cricut確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Cricut的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CRCT Earnings and Revenue Growth May 30th 2024
納斯達克GS:CRCT收益和收入增長 2024年5月30日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Cricut is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Petrus Trust Company, LTA is the largest shareholder with 58% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 1.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Ashish Arora, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。Cricut不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,Petrus Trust Company(LTA)是最大股東,已發行股份的58%。由於所有權持有如此巨額的股份,我們推斷他們對公司的未來擁有重大控制權。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的13%和1.7%。第二大股東阿什什·阿羅拉也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Cricut

Cricut 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Cricut, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.4b, and insiders have US$230m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Cricut, Inc.的大量股份。它的市值僅爲14億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2.3億美元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cricut. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有15%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Cricut有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Cricut (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了 Cricut 的 4 個警告信號(1 個有點令人擔憂!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論