share_log

Is AAR (NYSE:AIR) A Risky Investment?

Is AAR (NYSE:AIR) A Risky Investment?

AAR(紐約證券交易所代碼:AIR)是一項風險投資嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  05/30 19:58

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that AAR Corp. (NYSE:AIR) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

大衛·伊本說得好,他說:“波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本的永久損失。”當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。我們注意到,AAR公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:AIR)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使公司面臨風險。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務會帶來什麼風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

一般而言,只有當公司無法通過籌集資金或用自己的現金流輕鬆還清債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法向債權人付款,它可能會破產。但是,更頻繁(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東,以支撐其資產負債表。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。考慮公司的債務水平的第一步是同時考慮其現金和債務。

What Is AAR's Net Debt?

AAR 的淨負債是多少?

As you can see below, at the end of February 2024, AAR had US$274.7m of debt, up from US$185.6m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have US$69.2m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$205.5m.

如下所示,截至2024年2月底,AAR的債務爲2.747億美元,高於去年同期的1.856億美元。點擊圖片查看更多細節。但是,它確實有6,920萬美元的現金抵消了這一點,淨負債約爲2.055億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:AIR Debt to Equity History May 30th 2024
紐約證券交易所:航空債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 5 月 30 日

A Look At AAR's Liabilities

看看 AAR 的負債

The latest balance sheet data shows that AAR had liabilities of US$428.2m due within a year, and liabilities of US$425.6m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$69.2m in cash and US$343.6m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$441.0m.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,AAR的負債爲4.282億美元,之後到期的負債爲4.256億美元。與此相抵消的是,它有6,920萬美元的現金和3.436億美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額4.41億美元。

Of course, AAR has a market capitalization of US$2.47b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

當然,AAR的市值爲24.7億美元,因此這些負債可能是可以控制的。但是,有足夠的負債,我們肯定會建議股東今後繼續監督資產負債表。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。這樣,我們既考慮債務的絕對數量,也考慮爲債務支付的利率。

Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 1.1 and interest cover of 5.9 times, it seems to us that AAR is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. One way AAR could vanquish its debt would be if it stops borrowing more but continues to grow EBIT at around 18%, as it did over the last year. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine AAR's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

從其淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的1.1倍和利息覆蓋率的5.9倍來看,在我們看來,AAR可能正在以相當合理的方式使用債務。但是,利息支付肯定足以讓我們考慮其債務的負擔能力。AAR克服債務的一種方法是停止增加借款,但繼續像去年一樣將息稅前利潤增長至18%左右。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,未來的收益比什麼都更能決定AAR未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, AAR created free cash flow amounting to 17% of its EBIT, an uninspiring performance. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法減少債務。因此,我們總是檢查息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,AAR創造了相當於其息稅前利潤的17%的自由現金流,表現平淡無奇。這種低迷的現金轉換水平削弱了其管理和償還債務的能力。

Our View

我們的觀點

AAR's EBIT growth rate was a real positive on this analysis, as was its net debt to EBITDA. Having said that, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow somewhat sensitizes us to potential future risks to the balance sheet. Considering this range of data points, we think AAR is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for AAR you should know about.

根據這項分析,AAR的息稅前利潤增長率確實是積極的,其淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比例也是如此。話雖如此,它將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流在一定程度上使我們對資產負債表未來的潛在風險保持敏感。考慮到這一範圍內的數據點,我們認爲AAR完全有能力管理其債務水平。但要謹慎一點:我們認爲債務水平足夠高,足以證明持續監測是合理的。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。這些風險可能很難發現。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了你應該知道的4個AAR警告信號。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

畢竟,如果你對一家資產負債表堅如磐石的快速成長型公司更感興趣,那麼請立即查看我們的淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論