share_log

Institutional Investors in Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:CPRX) Lost 6.2% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:CPRX) Lost 6.2% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Catalyst Pharmicals, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CPRX)的機構投資者上週下跌6.2%,但已經從長期增長中受益
Simply Wall St ·  05/27 19:10

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Catalyst Pharmaceuticals的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 前十名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:CPRX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 74% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了Catalyst Pharmicals, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CPRX),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有74%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 6.2% in value last week. However, the 38% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降6.2%的機構投資者。但是,38%的股東一年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Catalyst Pharmaceuticals.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Catalyst Pharmicals的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:CPRX Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:CPRX 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Catalyst Pharmaceuticals?

關於催化劑製藥,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Catalyst Pharmaceuticals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Catalyst Pharmicals確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Catalyst Pharmicals過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:CPRX Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:CPRX 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 27 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 7.7% of Catalyst Pharmaceuticals. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.7% and 6.9% of the stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有Catalyst製藥公司7.7%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大股東,已發行股份的15%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.7%和6.9%的股份。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前十名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Catalyst Pharmaceuticals

催化劑製藥的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$115m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Catalyst Pharmicals, Inc.的股份。內部人士持有價值1.15億美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Catalyst Pharmaceuticals. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Catalyst Pharmicals擁有12%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Catalyst Pharmicals有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Catalyst Pharmaceuticals you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。一個很好的例子:我們發現了Catalyst Pharmicals的3個警告信號,你應該注意了。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論