share_log

With 84% Ownership, Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 84% Ownership, Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

Stifel Financial Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SF)擁有84%的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  05/26 22:06

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Stifel Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構在該股票中持有大量股份,Stifel Financial的股價可能會受到它們的交易決策的影響。
  • 業務的51%由前15名股東持有。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

Every investor in Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF) 的每個投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。最大的那部分是持有84%股權的機構。換句話說,該團隊面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stifel Financial.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對 Stifel Financial 的影響。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SF Ownership Breakdown May 26th 2024
紐交所:SF所有權分佈2024年5月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stifel Financial?

機構所有權告訴我們關於 Stifel Financial 的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stifel Financial. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Stifel Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在 Stifel Financial 中擁有相當的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資者社區中具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好不要依靠機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也有時候會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變他們對某個股票的看法,您可能會看到股價急劇下降。因此值得查看 Stifel Financial 下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SF Earnings and Revenue Growth May 26th 2024
紐交所:SF盈利和營業收入增長2024年5月26日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Stifel Financial is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Ronald Kruszewski, the CEO has 1.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的股份,因此他們可以共同影響董事會決策。Stifel Financial 不是由對沖基金持有的。目前,最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,佔流通股的10%。爲了獲得更多的背景信息,第二大股東持有約8.8%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.9%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Ronald Kruszewski持有1.3%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前15名股東在該公司中擁有51%的股權,這表明沒有單個股東對該公司具有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Stifel Financial

Stifel Financial 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Stifel Financial Corp.. Insiders own US$287m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人員擁有 Stifel Financial Corp. 的股份。內部人員擁有價值2.87億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會認爲這表明股東和董事會之間有良好的利益一致性。但是,有必要檢查這些內部人員是否一直在出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Stifel Financial. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆通常是個人投資者,他們持有 Stifel Financial 的12%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在政策決策方面影響,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Stifel Financial that you should be aware of.

我覺得查看公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但是,要想獲得深入的洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已識別出 Stifel Financial 的2個警告信號,您應該了解這些信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論