share_log

Institutional Investors in Marqeta, Inc. (NASDAQ:MQ) Lost 4.4% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Marqeta, Inc. (NASDAQ:MQ) Lost 4.4% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Marqeta, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MQ)的機構投資者上週下跌了4.4%,但已經從長期增長中受益
Simply Wall St ·  05/25 22:02

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Marqeta's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • 10% of Marqeta is held by insiders
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Marqeta的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • Marqeta 10% 的股份由內部人士持有

Every investor in Marqeta, Inc. (NASDAQ:MQ) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 61% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Marqeta, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MQ)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。機構擁有61%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.4% last week. However, the 14% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

投資虧損是任何股東都不喜歡的事情,更不用說上週持股價值下降4.4%的機構投資者了。但是,14%的股東一年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是,他們應該注意將來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Marqeta.

在下圖中,我們放大了Marqeta的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:MQ Ownership Breakdown May 25th 2024
NASDAQGS: MQ 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Marqeta?

關於Marqeta,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Marqeta already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Marqeta, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Marqeta已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Marqeta過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:MQ Earnings and Revenue Growth May 25th 2024
NASDAQGS: MQ 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 25 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Marqeta. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Jason Gardner (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 9.5% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Marqeta進行有意義的投資。根據我們的數據,我們推斷出最大股東是傑森·加德納(他還擁有最高關鍵高管的頭銜),其已發行股份佔9.5%。當內部人士擁有公司大量股份時,這通常被認爲是一個好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人士扮演關鍵利益相關者的角色。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約9.2%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有8.1%的所有權。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前十名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Marqeta

Marqeta的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Marqeta, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$2.7b, and insiders have US$278m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

內部人士似乎擁有Marqeta公司的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲27億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2.78億美元的股票。這非常重要。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Marqeta. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Marqeta18%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 8.1%, private equity firms could influence the Marqeta board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有8.1%的股份,可能會影響Marqeta董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Marqeta is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,Marqeta在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論