share_log

Institutional Investors in LendingClub Corporation (NYSE:LC) Lost 5.1% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in LendingClub Corporation (NYSE:LC) Lost 5.1% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

LendingClub Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:LC)的機構投資者上週下跌了5.1%,但已經從長期增長中受益
Simply Wall St ·  05/25 20:16

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in LendingClub implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構在LendingClub中的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有15名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

Every investor in LendingClub Corporation (NYSE:LC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

LendingClub Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:LC)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲77%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 5.1% in value last week. However, the 11% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降5.1%的機構投資者。但是,11%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of LendingClub.

在下圖中,我們放大了LendingClub的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LC Ownership Breakdown May 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LC 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LendingClub?

關於LendingClub,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in LendingClub. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see LendingClub's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在LendingClub中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到LendingClub的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LC Earnings and Revenue Growth May 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LC 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 25 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. LendingClub is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 10%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.5% and 6.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Scott Sanborn, the CEO has 1.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。LendingClub 不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有權爲10%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.5%和6.2%。此外,我們發現首席執行官斯科特·桑伯恩以其名義分配了1.3%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前15名股東的合併所有權爲51%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of LendingClub

LendingClub 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in LendingClub Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$31m worth of the US$998m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有LendingClub Corporation的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值9.98億美元的公司價值3100萬美元。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司20%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for LendingClub you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現了兩個你應該知道的LendingClub警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論