share_log

With 3.4% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Option Care Health, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPCH) 3.4% Stock Price Decline

With 3.4% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Option Care Health, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPCH) 3.4% Stock Price Decline

憑藉3.4%的一年期回報率,機構所有者可能會忽略Option Care Health, Inc.s(納斯達克股票代碼:OPCH)股價下跌3.4%
Simply Wall St ·  05/21 23:24

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Option Care Health's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Option Care Health的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 20 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近一直在買入

A look at the shareholders of Option Care Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPCH) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Option Care Health, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:OPCH)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲59%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.4% in value last week. Still, the 3.4% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降3.4%的機構投資者。儘管如此,3.4%的一年期漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體虧損。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Option Care Health.

在下圖中,我們放大了Option Care Health的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:OPCH Ownership Breakdown May 21st 2024
納斯達克GS:OPCH 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Option Care Health?

關於期權醫療健康,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Option Care Health. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Option Care Health, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在Option Care Health中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Option Care Health過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:OPCH Earnings and Revenue Growth May 21st 2024
納斯達克GS:OPCH 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 21 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Option Care Health. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 3.1% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Option Care Health進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大股東,已發行股份的12%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約11%和3.1%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 20 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前20位的公司合併所有權爲50%,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Option Care Health

期權醫療健康的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Option Care Health, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$32m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息表明,Option Care Health, Inc.內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一致。在本案中,內部人士擁有價值3200萬美元的股票。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司40%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Option Care Health (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經確定了Option Care Health的3個警告信號(至少有1個有點不愉快),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論