Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 5 hours 24 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,330.09
    +11.64 (+0.35%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,297.54
    -7.18 (-0.14%)
     
  • Dow

    38,786.53
    -283.06 (-0.72%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,992.54
    +71.75 (+0.42%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    68,230.12
    -1,652.12 (-2.36%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,477.53
    -18.92 (-1.27%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,254.18
    -63.41 (-0.76%)
     
  • Gold

    2,358.70
    +24.20 (+1.04%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    80.23
    +2.51 (+3.23%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.5420
    +0.0750 (+1.68%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,855.37
    -44.65 (-0.11%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,821.16
    -6.19 (-0.03%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,615.82
    -2.45 (-0.15%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,253.63
    -7,176.42 (-49.73%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,501.34
    -70.26 (-1.07%)
     

After a year of 1.6% returns, Intel Corporation's (NASDAQ:INTC) share price drop last week may have less of an impact on institutional investors

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Intel's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders

  • Recent purchases by insiders

Every investor in Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 66% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$4.8b last week. However, the 1.6% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Intel.

Check out our latest analysis for Intel

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Intel?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Intel already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Intel's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Intel. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.1%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.0% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.4% of the company stock.

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Intel

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that Intel Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$66m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Intel. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Intel you should be aware of.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.