share_log

With 82% Ownership, Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 82% Ownership, Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

Salesforce, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:CRM)擁有 82% 的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  05/13 20:39

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Salesforce's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着Salesforce的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有25名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

If you want to know who really controls Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Salesforce, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:CRM),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲82%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Salesforce, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Salesforce的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CRM Ownership Breakdown May 13th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CRM 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Salesforce?

關於Salesforce,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Salesforce does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Salesforce's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Salesforce確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Salesforce的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CRM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 13th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CRM 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 13 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Salesforce. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.6% of shares outstanding. With 7.5% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Marc Benioff, the CEO has 2.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Salesforce進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已發行股份爲8.6%。貝萊德公司和道富環球顧問公司分別擁有7.5%和4.7%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,我們發現首席執行官馬克·貝尼奧夫以其名義分配了2.3%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Salesforce

Salesforce 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Salesforce, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$7.2b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Salesforce, Inc.的部分股份。它是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共擁有價值72億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Salesforce. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有15%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Salesforce有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Salesforce better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Salesforce .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Salesforce,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在Salesforce中發現的兩個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論