share_log

Institutional Investors Control 48% of PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ:PUBM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 7.0%

Institutional Investors Control 48% of PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ:PUBM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 7.0%

机构投资者控制了PubMatic, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:PUBM)48%的股份,并在股票上涨7.0%后于上周获得了回报
Simply Wall St ·  05/08 23:09

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies PubMatic's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 16 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高机构所有权意味着PubMatic的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 前16名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

A look at the shareholders of PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ:PUBM) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看PubMatic, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:PUBM)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有48%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$79m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 90% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

在上周该公司的市值上涨了7900万美元之后,机构投资者的情况正在好转。目前,一年股东回报率为90%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of PubMatic.

在下图中,我们放大了PubMatic的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:PUBM Ownership Breakdown May 8th 2024
纳斯达克通用汽车公司:PUBM 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PubMatic?

关于PubMatic,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PubMatic. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of PubMatic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者在PubMatic中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下PubMatic过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:PUBM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 8th 2024
纳斯达克通用汽车公司:PUBM 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 8 日

PubMatic is not owned by hedge funds. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Amar Goel (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 8.5% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.5% and 7.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Rajeev Goel directly holds 5.5% of the total shares outstanding.

PubMatic 不归对冲基金所有。根据我们的数据,我们推断出最大股东是阿马尔·戈尔(他还拥有最高关键高管的头衔),已发行股份的8.5%。当内部人士拥有公司大量股份时,这通常被认为是一个好兆头,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人士扮演关键利益相关者的角色。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的8.5%和7.0%。此外,该公司首席执行官拉杰夫·戈尔直接持有已发行股份总额的5.5%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到50%的所有权由前16名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东拥有所有权的多数股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of PubMatic

PubMatic 的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of PubMatic, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.2b, and insiders have US$210m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看来内部人士拥有PubMatic, Inc.的很大一部分股份。它的市值仅为12亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值2.1亿美元的股票。这非常重要。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over PubMatic. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

PubMatic拥有35%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对PubMatic有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for PubMatic you should be aware of.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。一个很好的例子:我们发现了你应该注意的PubMatic的1个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发