Garrett Motion's (NASDAQ:GTX) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings
Garrett Motion's (NASDAQ:GTX) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings
A lackluster earnings announcement from Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ:GTX) last week didn't sink the stock price. We think that investors are worried about some weaknesses underlying the earnings.
加勒特汽車公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GTX)上週公佈的業績乏善可陳,但這並沒有使股價下跌。我們認爲,投資者擔心收益背後的一些弱點。
A Closer Look At Garrett Motion's Earnings
仔細看看Garrett Motion的收益
As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.
正如財務愛好者已經知道的那樣,現金流的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與其利潤相匹配程度的關鍵指標。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先從一段時間內的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均運營資產。你可以將現金流的應計比率視爲 “非FCF利潤率”。
As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".
因此,負應計比率對公司來說是正數,而正應計比率是負數。雖然正應計比率表明非現金利潤達到一定水平不是問題,但高應計比率可以說是一件壞事,因爲它表明紙面利潤與現金流不匹配。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年發表的一篇論文,“應計額較高的公司將來的利潤往往會降低”。
For the year to March 2024, Garrett Motion had an accrual ratio of -0.46. That implies it has very good cash conversion, and that its earnings in the last year actually significantly understate its free cash flow. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of US$350m, well over the US$6.00m it reported in profit. Garrett Motion's free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. Notably, the company has issued new shares, thus diluting existing shareholders and reducing their share of future earnings.
在截至2024年3月的一年中,Garrett Motion的應計比率爲-0.46。這意味着它的現金轉化率非常好,而且其去年的收益實際上大大低估了其自由現金流。事實上,在過去的十二個月中,它報告的自由現金流爲3.5億美元,遠遠超過其公佈的600萬美元利潤。Garrett Motion的自由現金流比去年有所改善,總體而言,這是值得期待的。值得注意的是,該公司發行了新股,從而稀釋了現有股東並減少了他們在未來收益中所佔的份額。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。
In order to understand the potential for per share returns, it is essential to consider how much a company is diluting shareholders. As it happens, Garrett Motion issued 248% more new shares over the last year. That means its earnings are split among a greater number of shares. To talk about net income, without noticing earnings per share, is to be distracted by the big numbers while ignoring the smaller numbers that talk to per share value. Check out Garrett Motion's historical EPS growth by clicking on this link.
爲了了解每股回報的可能性,必須考慮公司在多大程度上稀釋了股東。碰巧的是,Garrett Motion發行的新股比去年增加了248%。這意味着其收益將分配給更多的股票。在不注意每股收益的情況下談論淨收益,就是被大數字分散注意力,而忽略與之交談的較小數字 每股 價值。點擊此鏈接,查看Garrett Motion的歷史每股收益增長。
A Look At The Impact Of Garrett Motion's Dilution On Its Earnings Per Share (EPS)
看看Garrett Motion的稀釋對其每股收益(EPS)的影響
Unfortunately, Garrett Motion's profit is down 86% per year over three years. And even focusing only on the last twelve months, we see profit is down 88%. Like a sack of potatoes thrown from a delivery truck, EPS fell harder, down 96% in the same period. And so, you can see quite clearly that dilution is having a rather significant impact on shareholders.
不幸的是,Garrett Motion的利潤在三年內每年下降86%。而且,即使只關注過去的十二個月,我們也看到利潤下降了88%。就像從送貨卡車上扔出一袋土豆一樣,每股收益的下降幅度更大,同期下降了96%。因此,你可以清楚地看到,稀釋對股東產生了相當大的影響。
In the long term, if Garrett Motion's earnings per share can increase, then the share price should too. But on the other hand, we'd be far less excited to learn profit (but not EPS) was improving. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.
從長遠來看,如果Garrett Motion的收益 每股 可以上漲,那麼股價也應該上漲。但另一方面,得知利潤(但不是每股收益)正在改善,我們就不那麼興奮了。出於這個原因,假設目標是評估公司的股價是否可能上漲,你可以說從長遠來看,每股收益比淨收入更爲重要。
Our Take On Garrett Motion's Profit Performance
我們對Garrett Motion盈利表現的看法
In conclusion, Garrett Motion has a strong cashflow relative to earnings, which indicates good quality earnings, but the dilution means its earnings per share are dropping faster than its profit. Given the contrasting considerations, we don't have a strong view as to whether Garrett Motion's profits are an apt reflection of its underlying potential for profit. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Garrett Motion (including 2 which shouldn't be ignored).
總之,相對於收益而言,Garrett Motion的現金流強勁,這表明收益質量良好,但稀釋意味着其每股收益的下降速度快於利潤的下降速度。鑑於截然不同的考慮,我們對Garrett Motion的利潤是否恰當地反映了其潛在的盈利潛力沒有強烈的看法。有鑑於此,如果你想對公司進行更多分析,了解所涉及的風險至關重要。爲此,你應該了解我們在Garrett Motion中發現的4個警告信號(包括2個不容忽視的警告)。
Our examination of Garrett Motion has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.
我們對Garrett Motion的審查側重於某些可能使其收益看起來好於實際的因素。但是,如果你能夠將注意力集中在細節上,總會有更多的事情需要發現。有些人認爲高股本回報率是優質業務的好兆頭。雖然可能需要你進行一些研究,但你可能會發現這份免費收集的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份內部人士正在購買的股票清單很有用。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。