share_log

Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) Touches US$1.5b Market Cap

Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) Touches US$1.5b Market Cap

随着FLEX LNG Ltd.(纽约证券交易所代码:FLNG)市值达到15亿美元,拥有大量所有权的内部人士是主要的捐助者
Simply Wall St ·  05/08 19:28

Key Insights

关键见解

  • FLEX LNG's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in FLEX LNG is 21%
  • FLEX LNG 的大量内部所有权表明公司扩张有固有的利益
  • 50% 的业务由前四名股东持有
  • FLEX LNG的机构所有权为21%

Every investor in FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

FLEX LNG Ltd.(纽约证券交易所代码:FLNG)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。持有公司股份最多的集团是个人内部人士,准确地说约为44%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$1.5b market cap following a 3.8% gain in the stock.

结果,内部人士上周得分最高,该公司的市值在股价上涨3.8%后达到15亿美元。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of FLEX LNG, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究FLEX LNG的每种所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:FLNG Ownership Breakdown May 8th 2024
纽约证券交易所:FLNG 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FLEX LNG?

关于FLEX LNG,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that FLEX LNG does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of FLEX LNG, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,FLEX LNG确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下FLEX LNG过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FLNG Earnings and Revenue Growth May 8th 2024
纽约证券交易所:FLNG收益和收入增长 2024年5月8日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in FLEX LNG. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is John Fredriksen with 43% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.9% and 2.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对FLEX LNG进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是约翰·弗雷德里克森,已发行股份的43%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的2.9%和2.3%。

On looking further, we found that 50% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步观察,我们发现50%的股份由前四名股东持有。换句话说,这些股东在公司的决策中拥有有意义的发言权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of FLEX LNG

FLEX LNG 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of FLEX LNG Ltd.. Insiders own US$634m worth of shares in the US$1.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

内部人士似乎拥有FLEX LNG LNG有限公司的很大一部分股份。内部人士拥有这家价值15亿美元的公司价值6.34亿美元的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in FLEX LNG. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有FLEX LNG36%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for FLEX LNG (of which 2 don't sit too well with us!) you should know about.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如风险。每家公司都有,我们发现了 FLEX LNG 的 3 个警告信号(其中 2 个对我们来说不太合适!)你应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发