share_log

With 83% Institutional Ownership, Bank of Hawaii Corporation (NYSE:BOH) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 83% Institutional Ownership, Bank of Hawaii Corporation (NYSE:BOH) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

夏威夷银行公司(纽约证券交易所代码:BOH)拥有 83% 的机构所有权,是大公司的最爱
Simply Wall St ·  05/07 21:55

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Bank of Hawaii's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,夏威夷银行的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 52% 的业务由前 9 名股东持有
  • 分析师的预测以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有深刻的了解

A look at the shareholders of Bank of Hawaii Corporation (NYSE:BOH) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看夏威夷银行公司(纽约证券交易所代码:BOH)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为83%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构可以获得大量资金,因此他们的市场走势往往会受到散户或个人投资者的严格审查。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Bank of Hawaii, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究夏威夷银行的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BOH Ownership Breakdown May 7th 2024
纽约证券交易所:BOH 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 7 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bank of Hawaii?

关于夏威夷银行,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Bank of Hawaii. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bank of Hawaii's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所见,机构投资者在夏威夷银行拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到夏威夷银行的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BOH Earnings and Revenue Growth May 7th 2024
纽约证券交易所:BOH 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 7 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Bank of Hawaii. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.0% of the stock.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对夏威夷银行进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是贝莱德公司,其已发行股票的14%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约12%和6.0%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前9名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Bank of Hawaii

夏威夷银行的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Bank of Hawaii Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$46m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有夏威夷银行公司的股份。这是一家大公司,因此很高兴看到这种一致性。内部人士拥有价值4600万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Bank of Hawaii. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有夏威夷银行15%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Bank of Hawaii , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向夏威夷银行确定了一个警告信号,我们知道它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发