share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Paragon 28, Inc. (NYSE:FNA) Institutional Owners After Losing 43% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Paragon 28, Inc. (NYSE:FNA) Institutional Owners After Losing 43% Over the Past Year

在過去一年中下跌了43%之後,最近的上漲可能會安撫百麗宮28公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:FNA)的機構所有者
Simply Wall St ·  05/05 21:02

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Paragon 28 implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 機構在Paragon 28中的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 52% 的業務由前四名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近買了

Every investor in Paragon 28, Inc. (NYSE:FNA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 36% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Paragon 28, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:FNA)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲36%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 20% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 43%.

機構投資者將對上週股價上漲20%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的虧損總額達到令人失望的43%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Paragon 28.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Paragon 28的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:FNA Ownership Breakdown May 5th 2024
紐約證券交易所:FNA 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Paragon 28?

關於帕拉貢28,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Paragon 28 does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Paragon 28's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Paragon 28確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Paragon 28的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FNA Earnings and Revenue Growth May 5th 2024
紐約證券交易所:FNA收益和收入增長 2024年5月5日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Paragon 28. Bird B. AG is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. Albert DaCosta is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and MVM Partners LLP holds about 13% of the company stock. Albert DaCosta, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

對沖基金在《百利宮28》中的股票不多。Bird B. AG目前是最大股東,已發行股份的17%。艾伯特·達科斯塔是第二大股東,擁有13%的普通股,而MVM Partners LLP持有該公司約13%的股份。第二大股東阿爾伯特·達科斯塔也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Paragon 28

Paragon 28 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Paragon 28, Inc.. Insiders have a US$198m stake in this US$873m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Paragon 28, Inc.的大量股份。業內人士在這筆8.73億美元的業務中持有1.98億美元的股份。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司11%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 30% stake in Paragon 28. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有百麗宮2830%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Paragon 28 (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable) that you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了 Paragon 28 的 3 個警告信號(1 個讓我們有點不舒服),你應該注意這些標誌。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論