share_log

Individual Investors Own 18% of Hua Xia Bank Co., Limited (SHSE:600015) Shares but Private Companies Control 57% of the Company

Individual Investors Own 18% of Hua Xia Bank Co., Limited (SHSE:600015) Shares but Private Companies Control 57% of the Company

個人投資者擁有華夏銀行股份有限公司(上海證券交易所代碼:600015)18%的股份,但私人公司控制着該公司57%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  05/02 07:14

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Hua Xia Bank indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 57% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 私人公司在華夏銀行擁有大量所有權,這表明它們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 57% 的業務由前三名股東持有
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

If you want to know who really controls Hua Xia Bank Co., Limited (SHSE:600015), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 57% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着華夏銀行有限公司(SHSE: 600015),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。私營公司擁有57%的股份,是該公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Meanwhile, individual investors make up 18% of the company's shareholders.

同時,個人投資者佔公司股東的18%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hua Xia Bank.

在下圖中,我們放大了華夏銀行的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600015 Ownership Breakdown May 1st 2024
SHSE: 600015 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 1 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hua Xia Bank?

關於華夏銀行,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hua Xia Bank. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hua Xia Bank's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在華夏銀行擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到華夏銀行的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600015 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 1st 2024
SHSE: 600015 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 1 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hua Xia Bank. The company's largest shareholder is Beijing State-owned Capital Operation and Management Company Limited, with ownership of 22%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 19% and 16% of the stock.

對沖基金在華夏銀行的股份不多。該公司的最大股東是北京國有資本運營管理有限公司,所有權爲22%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約19%和16%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前三名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Hua Xia Bank

華夏銀行的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我們注意到,我們的數據並未顯示任何董事會成員個人持有股份。董事會成員不持有至少部分個人持股的情況很少見,因此我們的數據可能存在缺陷。一個不錯的下一步是檢查首席執行官的薪水是多少。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hua Xia Bank. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

華夏銀行擁有18%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對華夏銀行有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 57%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的57%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 16% of Hua Xia Bank stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

上市公司目前擁有華夏銀行16%的股份。很難肯定地說,但這表明它們將商業利益交織在一起。這可能是一個戰略利害關係,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變動。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hua Xia Bank better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Hua Xia Bank is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解華夏銀行,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,華夏銀行在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論