share_log

Schlumberger Limited's (NYSE:SLB) Market Cap Decline of US$3.0b May Not Have as Much of an Impact on Institutional Owners After a Year of 4.9% Returns

Schlumberger Limited's (NYSE:SLB) Market Cap Decline of US$3.0b May Not Have as Much of an Impact on Institutional Owners After a Year of 4.9% Returns

斯倫貝謝有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:SLB)市值下降30億美元,在回報率爲4.9%的一年之後,對機構所有者的影響可能不會那麼大
Simply Wall St ·  05/01 21:57

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Schlumberger implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持有斯倫貝謝的大量股權意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 17 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

Every investor in Schlumberger Limited (NYSE:SLB) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 85% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

斯倫貝謝有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:SLB)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有85%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$68b last week. However, the 4.9% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週該公司的市值跌至680億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。但是,4.9%的股東一年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是,他們應該注意未來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Schlumberger.

在下圖中,我們放大了斯倫貝謝的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SLB Ownership Breakdown May 1st 2024
紐約證券交易所:SLB 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 1 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Schlumberger?

關於斯倫貝謝,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Schlumberger does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Schlumberger's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,斯倫貝謝確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到斯倫貝謝的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SLB Earnings and Revenue Growth May 1st 2024
紐約證券交易所:SLB收益和收入增長 2024年5月1日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Schlumberger. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.6% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.9% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對斯倫貝謝進行有意義的投資。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲9.3%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有7.6%的普通股,道富環球顧問公司持有該公司約5.9%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前17名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Schlumberger

斯倫貝謝的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Schlumberger Limited. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$162m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有斯倫貝謝有限公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有該公司的很大一部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值1.62億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Schlumberger. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有斯倫貝謝15%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Schlumberger that you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了斯倫貝謝的3個警告信號,你應該注意這些信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論