share_log

With 83% Institutional Ownership, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 83% Institutional Ownership, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

愛德華茲生命科學公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:EW)擁有83%的機構所有權,是大公司中的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  04/29 19:46

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Edwards Lifesciences' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高機構所有權意味着愛德華茲生命科學的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 51% 的業務由前 24 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

Every investor in Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

愛德華茲生命科學公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:EW)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲83%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Edwards Lifesciences.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於愛德華茲生命科學的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:EW Ownership Breakdown April 29th 2024
紐約證券交易所:EW 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Edwards Lifesciences?

關於愛德華茲生命科學,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Edwards Lifesciences does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Edwards Lifesciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,愛德華茲生命科學確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看愛德華茲生命科學的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:EW Earnings and Revenue Growth April 29th 2024
紐約證券交易所:EW 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 29 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Edwards Lifesciences. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.7% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.7% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.5% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。對沖基金在愛德華茲生命科學的股票不多。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲8.7%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有8.7%的普通股,道富環球顧問公司持有該公司約4.5%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 24 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據後發現,前24名股東的總所有權爲51%,這意味着沒有一個股東佔多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Edwards Lifesciences

愛德華茲生命科學的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that Edwards Lifesciences Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$453m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,愛德華茲生命科學公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們預計內部人士不會擁有很大一部分股票。他們共擁有4.53億美元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Edwards Lifesciences. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有愛德華茲生命科學16%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論