share_log

Hangzhou AGS MedTech Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688581) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Cheng Zhang, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 13% Last Week

Hangzhou AGS MedTech Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688581) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Cheng Zhang, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 13% Last Week

杭州艾格斯醫療科技有限公司's(SHSE: 688581)最看漲的內部人士是首席執行官張成,他們的持股價值上週上漲了13%
Simply Wall St ·  04/24 12:55

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over HangzhouS MedTech implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 55% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in HangzhouS MedTech is 24%
  • 對杭州醫療科技的重大內部控制意味着公司增長的既得利益
  • 共有2位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲55%
  • 杭州醫療科技的機構所有權爲24%

Every investor in Hangzhou AGS MedTech Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688581) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 40% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

杭州艾格斯醫療科技股份有限公司(上海證券交易所代碼:688581)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。個人內部人士擁有40%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 13% gain.

結果,內部人士是上週13%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of HangzhouS MedTech, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究杭州醫療科技的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688581 Ownership Breakdown April 24th 2024
SHSE: 688581 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HangzhouS MedTech?

關於杭州醫療科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in HangzhouS MedTech. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of HangzhouS MedTech, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者持有杭州醫療科技的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看杭州醫療科技過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688581 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 24th 2024
SHSE: 688581 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 24 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in HangzhouS MedTech. The company's CEO Cheng Zhang is the largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對杭州醫療科技進行有意義的投資。該公司首席執行官張成是最大股東,持有40%的已發行股份。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約15%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.7%的所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細的研究表明,有兩位大股東通過其55%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of HangzhouS MedTech

杭州醫療科技的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Hangzhou AGS MedTech Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.7b worth of shares in the CN¥4.2b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有杭州AGS醫療科技有限公司的大量股份。內部人士擁有這家42億元人民幣公司價值17億元人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in HangzhouS MedTech. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有杭州醫療科技13%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 9.0%, of the HangzhouS MedTech stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎擁有杭州醫療科技9.0%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 15% of HangzhouS MedTech stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

上市公司目前擁有杭州醫療科技15%的股份。我們無法確定,但這很可能是一個戰略利益。這些企業可能是相似的,也可以是合作的。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand HangzhouS MedTech better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with HangzhouS MedTech , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解杭州的醫療科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經確定了杭州醫療科技的1個警告信號,我們知道它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論