share_log

Meisong Lai ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.'s (NYSE:ZTO) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 3.8%last Week

Meisong Lai ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.'s (NYSE:ZTO) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 3.8%last Week

美松來中通快遞(開曼)有限公司's(紐約證券交易所代碼:ZTO)首席執行官是最看漲的內部人士,上週他們的股票價值上漲了3.8%
Simply Wall St ·  04/23 20:31

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • ZTO Express (Cayman)'s significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in ZTO Express (Cayman) is 39%
  • 中通快遞(開曼)的大量內部所有權表明公司擴張的固有利益
  • 共有4位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 中通快遞(開曼)的機構所有權爲39%

If you want to know who really controls ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 40% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着中通快遞(開曼)有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:ZTO),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。個人內部人士擁有40%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 3.8% gain.

結果,內部人士是上週3.8%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ZTO Express (Cayman), beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究中通快遞(開曼)的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ZTO Ownership Breakdown April 23rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:中通所有權明細 2024年4月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZTO Express (Cayman)?

關於中通快遞(開曼),機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that ZTO Express (Cayman) does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ZTO Express (Cayman)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,中通快遞(開曼)確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到ZTO Express(開曼)的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ZTO Earnings and Revenue Growth April 23rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:中通2024年4月23日的收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ZTO Express (Cayman). Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Meisong Lai with 26% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Invesco Ltd., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 8.4%.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對中通快遞(開曼)進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是首席執行官賴美松,其已發行股份的26%。第二和第三大股東是阿里巴巴集團控股有限公司和景順有限公司,持股量相等,爲8.4%。

On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察,我們發現前四名股東持有51%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有有意義的發言權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of ZTO Express (Cayman)

中通快遞(開曼)的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$6.4b stake in this US$16b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有中通快遞(開曼)公司合理比例的股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項價值160億美元的業務中擁有64億美元的大量股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司12%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 8.4% of ZTO Express (Cayman) stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

上市公司目前擁有中通快遞(開曼)8.4%的股份。很難肯定地說,但這表明它們將商業利益交織在一起。這可能是一個戰略利害關係,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變動。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that ZTO Express (Cayman) is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,中通快遞(開曼)在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論