share_log

With 85% Ownership of the Shares, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ:GT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 85% Ownership of the Shares, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ:GT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

固特異輪胎橡膠公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GT)擁有85%的股票所有權,主要由機構所有者主導
Simply Wall St ·  04/22 22:03

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Goodyear Tire & Rubber's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着固特異輪胎橡膠的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有11名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有51%的所有權
  • 內部人士最近的購買

A look at the shareholders of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ:GT) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看固特異輪胎橡膠公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GT)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲85%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構可以獲得大量資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到散戶或個人投資者的嚴格審查。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Goodyear Tire & Rubber, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究固特異輪胎橡膠的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:GT Ownership Breakdown April 22nd 2024
NASDAQGS: GT 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Goodyear Tire & Rubber?

關於固特異輪胎和橡膠,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Goodyear Tire & Rubber already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Goodyear Tire & Rubber, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

固特異輪胎橡膠已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看固特異輪胎橡膠公司過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:GT Earnings and Revenue Growth April 22nd 2024
NASDAQGS: GT 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 22 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Goodyear Tire & Rubber. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 5.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在固特異輪胎橡膠的股票不多。貝萊德公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的13%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的10%和5.8%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前11名股東的合併所有權爲51%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Goodyear Tire & Rubber

固特異輪胎和橡膠的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$25m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義擁有固特異輪胎橡膠公司不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值2500萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Goodyear Tire & Rubber is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,固特異輪胎橡膠在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論