share_log

Individual Investors Are SATS Ltd.'s (SGX:S58) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped S$179m

Individual Investors Are SATS Ltd.'s (SGX:S58) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped S$179m

個人投資者是 SATS Ltd. 's (SGX: S58) 最大的所有者在市值下降1.79億新元后受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  04/22 14:57

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in SATS indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 49% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 個人投資者對SATS的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 49% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了SATS Ltd.(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:S58),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲50%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And following last week's 4.7% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌4.7%之後,個人投資者遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SATS.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於SATS的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:S58 Ownership Breakdown April 22nd 2024
SGX: S58 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SATS?

關於SATS,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in SATS. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see SATS' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在SATS中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到SATS的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:S58 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 22nd 2024
新加坡證券交易所:S58 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 22 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in SATS. The company's largest shareholder is Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, with ownership of 40%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 2.2% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 2.1% of the company stock.

對沖基金在SATS的股票不多。該公司的最大股東是淡馬錫控股(私人)有限公司,所有權爲40%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有2.2%的普通股,Vanguard Group, Inc.持有該公司約2.1%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of SATS

SATS 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that SATS Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own S$17m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,SATS Ltd.內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一致。在本案中,內部人士擁有價值1700萬新元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 50% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over SATS. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

由於擁有50%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對SATS有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 40%, private equity firms could influence the SATS board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有40%的股份,可能會影響SATS董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for SATS (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了 2 個 SATS 警告信號(1 個讓我們有點不舒服!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論